»
S
I
D
E
B
A
R
«
WHAT’S WRONG WITH THE MOVIES IS WHAT’S WONG WITH POLITICS
February 28th, 2011 by Clark Humphrey

To any sane person (other than a marketer or a techie), the current Hollywood major-studio feature films are by and large loud and idiotic.

How did they get this way?

Mark Harris, writing in GQ, has his own theory. To Harris, there was a time when the likes of Star Wars and Jaws could coexist in the multiplexes with the likes of An Officer and a Gentleman and The Shining. Then….

Then came Top Gun. The man calling the shots may have been Tony Scott, but the film’s real auteurs were producers Don Simpson and Jerry Bruckheimer, two men who pioneered the “high-concept” blockbuster—films for which the trailer or even the tagline told the story instantly. At their most basic, their movies weren’t movies; they were pure product—stitched-together amalgams of amphetamine action beats, star casting, music videos, and a diamond-hard laminate of technological adrenaline all designed to distract you from their lack of internal coherence, narrative credibility, or recognizable human qualities. They were rails of celluloid cocaine with only one goal: the transient heightening of sensation.

That’s exactly what’s also wrong with America’s political discourse.

A cable TV channel (founded by a Hollywood studio) has taken effective control of one of the two major parties. Along with its radio pundit counterparts, it dumbs down all debate into simplistic emotional manipulations. You’re not even supposed to think about what they’re saying. You’re just supposed to react with anger/hubris/fear on cue.

PS: The 2011 Oscars? What a bore of self congratulatory tripe. Even more than usual.

The celebrities and their handlers are not even pretending, for the most part, to be living in a world remotely resembling the real America of the bottom 98 percent.

the ordeal was “sped up” in the wrong way, by taking out any potential for spontaneity and water cooler moments, leaving the bare bones outline of the massive droning ritual with no “breathing room,” no chance for personality or creativity. Much like your standard assembly line major studio movies themselves. The only “moments,” such as they were, were a senile Kirk Douglas refusing to stick to the script and the appearance of Mr Trent Reznor in a tux. That and a sharp political barb by the Best Documentary winner were, I am afraid, it.

One more reason for me to say: Save the movies. Kill Hollywood.


One Response  
  • Art Marriott writes:
    March 3rd, 201112:36 pmat

    I fear what we may end up seeing is the demise of both. The movie/TV/cable/Internet media industry (which has indeed merged into one awkward mess) is on a tear to use (less and less expensive) technical razzle-dazzle to replace genuine creativity. The ultimate wet dream of every studio executive is that we’ll reach a point where the animation outfits have enough easily customizable environments and rigs in their server farms, it’ll be possible to crank out “action” films literally by automation, eliminating actors, writers and as many other live bodies as possible from the entire equation. This would turn the entertainment industry into something like Orwell’s “ministry of culture”, turning out pabulum for an increasingly dumbed-down audience. This would in turn be the end of southern California as a major contributor to our culture. A vibrant movie industry, with its attendant juxaposition of great quantities of creativity and money, has made Los Angeles what it is today. Absent that, it’s likely to devolve to nothing more than another dreary, blighted post-industrial wasteland.


Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

»  Substance:WordPress   »  Style:Ahren Ahimsa
© Copyright 1986-2025 Clark Humphrey (clark (at) miscmedia (dotcom)).