»
S
I
D
E
B
A
R
«
THINGS GONE AND GOING, PART 2
Jan 11th, 2001 by Clark Humphrey

YESTERDAY AND TODAY, some recent departures from the pop-cult scene, locally and nationally.

THINGS THAT HAVE GONE AWAY #5: Our Love and War Man already misses Mike Mailway (real name Larry M. Boyd), whose locally-based syndie trivia column ended a week and a half ago. Always wished I could write like him. That staccato, crime-movie-soundtrack rhythm. The eternally provocative mix of historic, scientific, and just odd facts gathered from all times and places. Had the privilege of meeting him a few times; always the perfect gent. I wish him well.

THINGS THAT ARE GOING AWAY #1: What with all the sanctimonious gnashing-O-teeth that’s gone on over the threatening might of big-box chain bookstores, you might not expect any tears for the demise of such an outlet. But loyal customers are indeed huing and ado-ing over the impending loss of Tower Books on lower Queen Anne. Cause of death: The usual (mercenary rent hike).

The store’s annual 30-percent-off pre-inventory sale is being extended until closing day, Feb. 4. It’ll be missed, partly because Tower’s one chain that acted sorta like an indie in its niche-marketing prowess. Because most of its other outlets were attached to Tower Records stores, it was big on the sorts of books CD buyers like. Glossy pop-star tomes, yes; but also coffee-table art and photography, sci-fi, erotica, student reference, self-help, astrology, comix, lefty-politics, Beat-generation nostalgia, and literary-hipster fiction. (Although the approach had its drawbacks, such as when they had to put the Bukowski novels behind the counter to prevent theft by suburban down-and-outer wannabes.)

Tower says it wants to eventually build a book annex on the site of its current record store six blocks away, but has given no timetable for the project.

THINGS THAT ARE GOING AWAY #2: Puget Consumers Co-op is closing its oldest alterna-food and vitamin store, in Ravenna. Way back in the early ’80s, when PCC really was a cooperatively-run small merchant, Ravenna was its only space (it had previously been an even smaller food-buying club). It was a subculture, a ‘tribe’ if you wish.

As you may know, I’m something of a skeptic about many of today’s neo-Puritanical food religions (macrobiotic, organic, vegan, ‘live,’ etc.). But I had, and have, every respect for the healthful values of community, of being part of a circle of humans who care about one another. That’s something PCC gradually lost as it became a professionally-managed chain store.

THINGS THAT ARE GOING AWAY #3: The Seattle Times Co., citing a need to cut costs due to recent circumstances (see below), is shutting Mirror, its eight-year-old monthly tabloid for teenagers.

I was a part-time assistant on Mirror’s first five issues. The yup-ladies who ran it had believed those mainstream-media scare stories that Those Kids Today were all a bunch of illiterate louts; so the yup-ladies thought they’d need an adult to write the paper. But the editors soon realized that many public high school students really can read and write (they just choose not to read the Seattle Times); so my services proved unneeded.

THINGS THAT ARE GOING AWAY #4: With the end of the Seattle newspaper strike comes the end of the strike paper, the Seattle Union Record.

As I’ve said previously, it was about two-thirds of the way toward becoming the real opposition daily this town needs. While the Newspaper Guild won’t be publishing the Union Record anymore (or drumming up other unions for sympathy ads), many of the Seattle Times strikers won’t be returning to their old jobs, and hence might be available to continue their Record work under new management. I’d love to be a part of making such a paper happen.

Let’s all talk about this again real soon.

TOMORROW: People you’re not better than.

ELSEWHERE:

BODY AND SOUL
Jan 8th, 2001 by Clark Humphrey

LAST FRIDAY, we began a talk about how passe pop-culture genres are reguarly given an extra lease of life by being remarketed toward born-again Christians. Then we mentioned one particularly passe pop-culture genre (pornography) and how a Christian (or at least spiritual) focus might revive it.

That simple gimmick led me to pondering a whole bigger question–how to bring sex, and a healthy respect for it, back to Christendom.

This might seem either double-icky or sacreligious to some of you. I assure you I don’t intend to be either.

After all, many of the world’s great religions and cultures have embraced strongly sexualized images and messages–including the Euro-pagan cultures Christianity borrowed so much else from.

What I imagine, in 3 parts:

  • 1: Artistic works supporting a lusty, zestful, sensual, playful faith.
  • 2: Rituals (either in person or shot on video) in which couples, individuals, and even groups perform sexual rites dedicated to the greater being, to the interconnectedness of God’s creation.
  • 3: Stories and essays describing sexuality, sexual acts, and sexualized relationships in this context. they could range from the high-literary to the low-paperback levels.

Examples and precedents from over the centuries:

  • The sexy parts of the Bible, natch; from Ruth and the Song of Solomon to the various tales of seduction, masturbation, revelry, nudity, and such.
  • The fetishist elements of old Catholic and Orthodox art; Mary’s pink full-body halo.
  • The raunchy, fleshy tradition of The Canterbury Tales.
  • The whole history of “naughty” religious-themed storytelling in art, prose, verse, and film, in which storytellers have tried to force sex back into religion, often with fetishistic, violent, and deliberately sacrilegous visions. Naughty nuns, naughty priests, naughty Catholic schoolgirls, naughty Victorians, eroticized versions of classic sacred iconography, etc.
  • The examples of sex-spirit integration in the cultures and traditions Christianity borrowed pieces of itself from–Hebrews, Greeks, Celtics, et al.–and in some of the world’s other great cultures.
  • Some of the recent prosex interpretations of Judeo-Christian teaching. These range from the mild spirit-body reconciliations of Thomas Moore’s book The Soul of Sex to the outspokenly gay-friendly advocacy of L. William Countryman’s Dirt, Greed, and Sex: Sexual Ethics in the New Testament.
  • More generalized sex-and-spirit advocacies, from George Battaille’s Erotism and The Tears of Eros to Rufus Camphausen’s Encyclopedia of Sacred Sexuality.
  • A scene in the sketch-comedy film Amazon Women of the Moon, spoofing a centerfold video, in which the model is shown nude, in church, in a pew with her dressed and respectful parents.
  • The closing of Russ Meyer’s last film, Beneath the Valley of the Ultravixens, in which a radio faith-healer having ecstatic sex in her studio, to the strains of “Gimme That Old Time Religion.”

TOMORROW: The last of this for now, I promise.

ELSEWHERE:

  • What the heck is emo music anyway? This site attempts to explain….
IT'S SO PATRONIZING
Jan 4th, 2001 by Clark Humphrey

MANY ARTS AND THEATER PUBLICATIONS have come and gone, nationally and locally, over the years.

The local attempts have mostly foundered or struggled on a lack of cash flow. Artists and artsy-type folk are often considered insufficiently upscale for advertisers to bother with. Already-strapped funding organizations have had other priorities than merely documenting whatever visual or performing projects are already out there. That’s left these would-be documentors to work on an all-volunteer basis, with the personal-burnout rates and marketing weaknesses built into that concept.

One local outfit thinks it has the answer. Their magazine’s aimed not at artists, nor even at the bulk of their audiences.

Instead, Arts Patron (whose third issue should be out this month) is aimed squarely at upper-crust good-life-livers who (as a common stereotype goes) “Support the Arts” partly out of a good-works motivation, partly for the tax breaks, and partly for social status.

It’s mailed free to addresses on the fundraising mailing lists of ten participating theaters, museums, and hibrow-music ensembles. The rest of us have to read it online. (Thus keeping those downscale painters and actors and other assorted boho types from lowering the print edition’s advertiser value).

Seattle didn’t used to have very many of these patrons. Certainly not enough for a slick nine-times-a-year magazine to be aimed just at them. But post-Bill Seattle apparently has enough for publisher Jonathan Nichols to give it a shot. (If the concept works, Nichols may try to expand it to other towns.)

Should us non-gazillionaires care about the whole endeavor? From the looks of the first two issues, yes. Editor Douglas McLellan (who briefly was the best thing that had ever happened to the P-I arts section) has gone beyond mere PR hypeage for the mag’s participating institutions. Sure there are big pieces about the new Bellevue Arts Museum and the John Singer Sargent show at the Seattle Art Museum. But there are also big pieces about the Total Experience Gospel Choir, filmmaker Sandy Cioffi, the alterna-art space Howard House, and local mural-preservation advocate Roger van Oosten. McLellan himself contributes an important item about a UW study showing ballet dancers can have careers as short and injury-prone as pro football players (at far lower salaries).

So go to the site. Let its makers know you like it, and that you deserve the chance to see it in print even if you’re not a gazillionaire.

IN OTHER NEWS: Loyal reader Danny Goodisman writes, “Rumor has it, Paul Schell may run for re-election. To help him along, here are proposed slogans for Paul Schell’s re-election:

  • 10. Still not a wimp.

  • 9. Support international child labor.

  • 8. Affordable housing for the rich.

  • 7. Once a developer, always a developer.

  • 6. Give corporate welfare a chance.

  • 5. Blacks and Hispanics ‘raus.

  • 4. Known round the world.

  • 3. More ugly architecture for the Center.

  • 2. King County multi-billionaires agree: Paul Schell for mayor.

  • 1. Leadership which can bring tears to your eyes.”

TOMORROW: How to revive any waning popcult genre–make it Christian.

ELSEWHERE:

THE INNIES AND THE OUTIES
Dec 29th, 2000 by Clark Humphrey

THE TRADITION CONTINUES: For the 15th consecutive year, here’s your fantastical MISCmedia In/Out List. Thanks to all who contributed suggestions.

As always, this list predicts what will become hot or not-so-hot over the course of the Year of HAL 9000; not necessarily what’s hot or not-so-hot now. If you think every person, place, thing, or trend that’s big now will just keep getting bigger forever, I’ve got some dot-com stocks to sell you.

(P.S.: Most every damned item on this list has a handy weblink. Spend the weekend clicking and having fun.)

INSVILLE

OUTSKI

White kids who wish they were doo-wop singers

White kids who wish they were pimps

Seattle Union Record

Seattle Scab Times

Canadian Football League

Xtreme Football League

The print version of Nerve

Hardcore pay-per-view

Classic Arts Showcase

TNN

Christian sex clubs

Abstinance preaching

The American Prospect

The Weekly Standard

Retro burlesque

Thong Thursday

Razor scooters (still)

General Motors

Independent publishing

eBooks

Jon Stewart (now more than ever)

Chris Matthews

Dot-orgs

Dot-coms

Kamikazes

Martinis

Grant Cogswell

Tim Eyman

Whoopass

Powerade

Tantra

Bloussant

2-Minute Drill

Survivor

Verso

Regnery

Political gridlock

“Bipartisanship”

Scarlet Letters

Cosmo Girl

Renewing Tacoma

Saving San Francisco

Caffe Ladro

Folger’s Latte

TiVo

UltimateTV

McSweeney’s (still)

Tin House

Napster (while it lasts)

Liquid Music

Austin, home of political chicanery

Austin, home of hip music

Lookout Records

Interscope (still)

Public displays of affection

Personal digital assistants

Jared Leto

Chris O’Donnell

Building an all-around team

Depending on one superstar

Helen Hunt

Gwyneth Paltrow

Kenneth Lonergan

Robert Zemeckis

Open-source software

Microsoft.NET

“Slow food”

Fast Company

Goth revival #7

Ska revival #13

Antenna Internet Radio

The Funky Monkey 104.9

Bed Bath and Beyond

Lowe’s Home Centers

Green Republicans

Corporate Democrats

Gents

Dudes

Vamps

Bimbos

Collecting early home computers

Collecting Pokemon cards

Concerts in houses

House music

Cafe Venus and Mars Bar

Flying Fish

Fat pride

No-carb diets

Dump-Schell movement

Kill-transit movement

Hard cider

Hard lemonade

Indie gay films

Showtime’s Queer As Folk

Boondocks

Zits

Internet telephony (at last)

Wireless Internet

Coronation Street (UK soap on CBC)

Dawson’s Creek

Energy conservation

Energy deregulation

Microsoft breakup

AOL/Time Warner merger

Dark blue

Beige

Pho

Chalupas

Caleb Carr

Stephen King

’90s nostalgia

’80s nostalgia

Toyota Echo

Range Rover

Sweat equity

Venture capital

Reality

“Reality TV”

Rubies

Crystals

Blackjack

NASDAQ

Matt Bruno

Ricky Martin

Quinzo’s

Subway

Hamburg

Mazatlan

Georgetown

Belltown

Red wine

Ritalin

Rational thinking

“War on Drugs”

Economic democracy

Corporate restructuring

Culottes

Teddies

Following your own path

Believing dumb lists

NO COLUMN MONDAY, BUT ON TUESDAY: What you might see on this site in the year of Also Sprach Zarathustra.

ELSEWHERE:

THINGS I LIKE 2000
Nov 24th, 2000 by Clark Humphrey

IT’S BEEN A WHILE since I did an all-list column, but this and the next will be such.

Today, in a post-Thanksgiving gesture of sorts, are as many Things I Like as I can think of right now (just to placate those readers who falsely complain that I never seem to like anything), in no particular order:

  • Snow. Hope we get some in Seattle this winter.
  • Discovering a great new band.
  • Luxuria Music, a streaming net-radio station playing a mix of lounge, jazz, surf, bebop, soundtracks, and other “music to stimulate the entire organism.” It’s co-curated by The Millionaire, formerly co-leader of cocktail nation faves Combustible Edison.
  • Brave New Waves, a nightly program of experimental and just plain odd music from the CBC (and streamed online at 9 p.m. PT).
  • The inventive products of North America’s packaged-food and fast-food industries.
  • Sex. (Well, duh….) Specifically, the kind of sex that brings two people closer together on psychic-emotional-physical levels.

    (Though there’s also much to be said for daydreamt fantasies involving Adrienne Shelly in a private railroad car with piped-in Bollywood movie music and a few cases of Reddi-Wip.)

  • Harper’s Magazine.
  • Collecting old magazines, especially the kinds that aren’t normally collected (Time, Seventeen, Family Circle).
  • Pre-1970 nudist books and magazines. Hard to tell which aspect of these images is more worldview-skewing: The sight of pre-hippie-era grownups (of all ages, genders, and physiques) unabashedly nude, the sight of unabashedly nude grownups in deliberatley non-erotic (sometimes even anti-erotic) poses, or the accompanying text sermons defending the lifestyle as being just as clean, wholesome, and sexually repressed as any deserving aspect of mainstream American life.

    (The new “Imagined Landscapes” show at Consolidated Works includes a group of three hyperrealistic paintings by NY artist Peter Drake based on ’50s nudist-mag images, only with suburban front yards for backgrounds instead of open picnic grounds.)

  • The new Office Depot at 4th and Pike.
  • Unexpected phone calls from people I personally know who aren’t trying to sell me something.
  • The recent election mess. No, really. It was one of those fun interruptions of the daily grind, and it kept going into ever-further absurdity levels like an Absolutely Fabulous script.
  • Glow-in-the-dark green plastic. You can get it in everything from yo-yos to toothbrushes to Burger King promo toys. Heck, you can even get an Apple iBook in it!
  • Grocery deliveries.
  • Online reference libraries.
  • Pyramid Snow Cap Ale.
  • Digital video camcorders. The devices which just might yet kill Hollywood. (You’re getting me one for Christmas, right?)
  • The recent Pac-10 football season, which came down to the last weekend with three (count ’em!) of the conference’s four Northwest teams battling it out for the championship–including the long-humbled, now-proud Oregon State Beavers!
  • The conveniences of modern life; including but not limited to indoor plumbing, electricity, telephone service, public transportation, trash pickup, a division-of-labor setup wherein many of us don’t have to toil out in the fields tending crops unless we want to, digital cable, photocopiers, and electronic bill paying.
  • Truly wacky ’70s movies, such as Lisa and the Devil or Dolemite.
  • Money. Just love the stuff. Wish I had some now.

(If this amused you, there’s also a separate Things I Like page on this site, which duplicates almost none of the items on this list.)

MONDAY: Another list, this one of people who aren’t really better than you.

IN OTHER NEWS: Thursday saw a skinny scab-edition P-I but no Times, at least not in the downtown, Capitol Hill, and North End neighborhoods of my holiday travels. Today will likely see no Friday entertainment sections; causing movie-time-seeking readers to grab for weekly or suburban papers. What will the Sunday Times look like, aside from preprinted feature sections? We’ll find out.

ELSEWHERE:

FULL DISCLOSURE
Nov 23rd, 2000 by Clark Humphrey

IN A SHORT-SHORT FICTION PIECE I haven’t uploaded to this site yet, I once imagined some potential Playboy magazine nudie features of the future: “America’s Sexiest Female CEOs,” “America’s Sexiest Female Judges,” “America’s Sexiest Congresswomen,” etc.

One I skipped: “America’s Sexiest Anchorwomen.”

It’s an odd omission. TV stations and networks have been hiring pretty ladies to share anchor desks with hairspray boys for decades. (One of Seattle’s most memorable, Sandy Hill, was an ex-Miss Washington who wound up co-hosting every newscast on the station from noon to 11 pm, before becoming Joan Lunden’s predecessor on Good Morning America.)

All this talk is a lead-in to discussing a peculiar softcore-fetish website, The Naked News.

It’s a 15-minute streaming video newscast, with a new edition each weekday. While it has no field reporters or on-the-scene footage, its four Toronto-based studio anchors read competently-written briefs headlining the day’s news, weather, and sports.

All the anchors are young women. All of them either appear on camera fully nude, or strip from dress-for-success outfits until they’re wearing only their microphones.

The concept’s borrowed from a Russian program that appears on regular TV over there. That show’s bare news readers have occasionally even staged (nude) on-location interviews with (clothed) major government officials.

The American Naked News anchors all keep straight, tho’ perky, faces during their readings. Their only variation from standard newsreader behavior is a short rump-wiggling walkoff at the conclusion of their segments. Their faces, hair styles, and (when they have any) costumes are standard-issue anchorwoman style, not stripper or porn-star or dominatrix style. If not for their perfect (perhaps surgically perfected) figures, they could be the sort of women a young-adult male Internet user might work alongside–or for.

Their straightforward demeanor also differentiates The Naked News from the constant, screeching hard-sell tactics common to sex sites. The streaming video contains commercials, but they’re relatively tame ones (for other entertainment websites). The site’s lack of constant selling is just as relieving as its lack of hardcore crudeness.

None of this means many female Net users would enjoy viewing The Naked News, or even approve of its existence.

The site’s stars might be pronounced non-bimbos, and they might project in-charge images, but they’re still portraying male fantasies, performing to be stared at.

To such potential critics, I might say that heterosexuality has always been with us and likely always will be. As long as most het-male brains are wired to respond to visual stimuli, such stimuli will be produced. They might as well be stimuli that emphasize beauty over crudity, with at least a modicum of brains and humor and friendliness.

And while The Naked News may be a trifle, a light-entertainment novelty work, it’s really no more entertainment-oriented than many news and “reality” shows on broadcast TV. (And it’s no less journalistically respectable than some of them either.)

IN OTHER NEWS: The first strikebound editions of the Seattle Times and Post-Intelligencer came out yesterday. They’re flimsy li’l 24-page things, full of wire copy, syndicated columns, and database features (weather, TV listings).

Because they were printed even earlier in the day than Tuesday’s last pre-strike papers, they didn’t include any evening sports results, stock listings, or even the Florida Supreme Court’s Presidential-recount ruling. Classified ads were truncated on a quota basis, unseen since the days of WWII paper rationing.

The result: Morning papers you didn’t need all day to read. A partial vindication for my long-held wish for a brisker, more immediate, even “alternative” daily; the sort of concept that could potentially bring true competition to the print-news biz and dislodge the local-monopoly papers such as those currently being struck.

(More strike news, and new material by picketing newshacks, is at The Seattle Union Record.

IN OTHER OTHER NEWS: George Clark, who’s self-published several occasional parodies of The Stranger and The Weekly over the years (so typographically accurate, many readers originally thought the Stranger staff had actually produced them!), has issued another, spoofing both tabloids in a double-cover format. The issue seems to have been in the works for some time; it contains parodies of features The Stranger hasn’t carried for two years or more (including my old section, cutely relabeled “Miscellanal”).

TOMORROW: Some things I actually like.

ELSEWHERE:

  • Remember the Joan Rivers movie Rabbit Test? Or the feminist bumper stickers, “If men could get pregnant….” Well, one man claims he is!…
BYLINES AND PICKET LINES
Nov 22nd, 2000 by Clark Humphrey

TODAY’S PREVIOUSLY-ANNOUNCED CONTENTS have been postponed so we can instead discuss the biggest Seattle media story since the Kingdome boom-boom.

It’s the big strike by the Pacific Northwest Newspaper Guild. It’s the town’s first newspaper strike since ’53 (and, thanks to the Joint Operating Agreement, the first to hit both the Times and P-I).

Already, the effects have been felt. Monday’s papers included the big ad stuffers normally seen on Thanksgiving; Tuesday’s papers were printed early in the evening to avoid any truckers’ sympathy walkout, and thusly didn’t mention Monday Night’s NBA or NFL results.

The big changes start today, when the papers try to put out at least a semblance of their normal product; to be distributed for free and staffed by management and out-of-state scabs. (I briefly considered applying to be a replacement newshack, but quickly dropped the idea.)

Striking reporters, editors, ad sellers, and deliverers have already started an online strike paper, the Seattle Union Record. A print Union Record is currently scheduled to start next week.

The Union Record name, as editor Chuck Taylor describes it, comes from “a labor-backed paper during the time of the General Strike of 1919, during which 65,000 Seattle workers silenced the city for five days. Before it began, Union Record editor Anna Louise Strong predicted it would lead ‘no one knows where!’ We know how she felt.”

So how might the strike affect the local media landscape?

It will immediately hurt the papers’ finances during the start of the big pre-Xmas ad season.

If it drags on, it will further erode the Times/P-I consortium’s fat and non-sassy hold on regional discourse.

Locally and around the country, newspaper circulation’s failed to keep up with population growth. Local daily-paper readership hasn’t fallen as precipitously as local TV-news viewership, but it’s still flat. (When the Times moved to morning circulation earlier this year, it mostly took readers away from the P-I.)

And while the JOA might have a monopoly on bigtime daily circulation in town, its franchise is beset on all sides by insurgent suburban dailies, weeklies (“alternative” and otherwise), news and want-ad Websites, and the three big national dailies.

For a few years now, I’ve found rarified souls in the Capitol Hill-Belltown-U District belt who, when I tell them about something published that day in “the Times,” automatically assume I mean the New York Times. There were even a couple of early Stranger writers from out of town who took their refusal to read local papers as a matter of pride; even when the resulting ignorance led them to attempting to cross Fourth Avenue on the night of the Seafair parade.)

And if it really drags on, the Times-owning Blethen family just might finally give in and sell their controlling interest in the paper to the Knight-Ridder chain, which owns 49 percent of its stock currently. Knight-Ridder is partnered with Gannett in the JOA-run papers in Detroit, which have been stuck in a protracted strike/lockout mess that’s gone on for year after year, with no end in sight, to the papers’ detriment as well as the workers’.

Perhaps that looming threat will serve as enough incentive for the two sides in Seattle to find a settlement.

TOMORROW: A different way of exposing the news.

ELSEWHERE:

DARING TO BE DULL
Nov 16th, 2000 by Clark Humphrey

SHORT STUFF TODAY, starting with another dare received on an email list.

A WILD BORE: Nickelodeon recently debuted Pelswick, a cartoon series created by our favorite Portland paraplegic satirist John Callahan. Its hero is a 13-year-old boy, who just happens to use a wheelchair.

One emailer on one of the lists I’m on noted that, not too long ago, such a character situation would never have been deemed an appropriate topic for a children’s light-entertainment series. This correspondent also asked if anyone could “name a subject that isn’t at least potentially entertaining.”

Here’s what I came up with:

  • Claims adjustors.
  • A year in the life of a flaxseed farm.
  • A plastics chemist at Chrysler testing new PVC formulae for use in doorknobs and cup holders.
  • A few hundred K of decompiled source code for HVAC systems-management software.
  • A drizzly Tuesday night in late January in Aberdeen, Wash.
  • A dark corner of outer space where no matter or light ever passes through.
  • An all-New York City World Series.

(On the other hand, a drawn-out, never-concluding Presidential election is about as much fun as one can have with one’s garments currently being worn.)

YOU ROCK, ‘GRL’!: Media reaction to the ROCKRGRL Music Conference, Seattle’s biggest alterna-music confab in five years, was nothing if not predictable.

Before the conference, the big papers described it as an attempt to get a “women in rock” movement back on track after the end of Lilith Fair (which was really an acoustic singer-songwriter touring show, and which had included almost no nonsinging female instrumentalists).

During the conference, the papers tried to brand everyone in it as reverse-sexists, out to denounce “the male dominated music industry” and anything or anyone with a Y chromosome. Many of the speakers and interviewees, however, declined to fall in line with this preconceived line. Some at the panel discussions took time to thank husbands, boyfriends, band members, and other XY-ers who’ve supported their work. Others in interviews insisted their musical influences and life heroes weren’t as gender-specific as the interviewers had hoped. (Even at the discussion about violent “fans,” someone noted that stalkers and attackers can be anyone (cf. the Selena tragedy).)

And as for the music industry, it’s not built on gender but on money and power games; games which routinely prove disastrous for maybe 80 percent of male artists and 90 percent of female artists. (We’ll talk a little more about this tomorrow.)

THE END OF SOMETHING BIG: Saw Game Show Network’s hour-long tribute to Steve Allen a couple weeks back. Was reminded of how, seeing one of his last talk shows as a teenager, he was briefly my idol. He did silly things; he always kept the proceedings moving briskly. He also wrote fiction and nonfiction books, plays, and thousands of songs.

Of course, nobody remembers any of the songs, except the one he used as his own theme song. And the books and plays were essentially forgettable trifles. His main work was simply being funny on TV, and he was able to do it on and off for nearly 50 years.

As for his latter-day involvement with a right-wing pro-censorship lobby, you have to remember he was the son of vaudeville performers and was steeped in the old American secular religion of Wholesome Entertainment. To him, the past two or three decades’ worth of cultural bad boys and girls probably didn’t really represent a “moral sewer” but a mass heresy against what, to him, had been the One True Faith.

THE MARKETPLACE-O-IDEAS: The NY Times reports about some American leftist economists (including James Tobin, Jeremy Rifkin, and Bruce Ackerman) who’ve found an appreciative and excited audience for their ideas–in Europe.

You can think of it as the socio-philosophical equivalent of those U.S. alterna-music bands that could only get record contracts overseas.

You can also think of it as another of the unplanned effects of cultural globalization. Even avid opponents of a world system ruled by U.S. corporations are taking their ideas from Americans.

TOMORROW: Apres Napster, le deluge.

ELSEWHERE:

BOOK REVIEW CONFIDENTIAL
Nov 14th, 2000 by Clark Humphrey

Book Review Confidential

by guest columnist Doug Nufer

WHY DO PEOPLE WRITE BOOK REVIEWS?

I used to think the whole point of this racket was to force publishers to pay attention to my own books. Editorial screeners, however, have little clout or they simply resent query letters that lead with a whiff of a tit-for-tat proposal for them to accept me as a potential supplier of literary merchandise in exchange for my support of their products.

The reviewer gig does offer some perks, like free samples; and it’s usually more lucrative to write about books than to write the damn things, even when you factor in all of the time it takes to read them.

Apart from industrial considerations such as personal career advancement, there’s an altruistic side to book reviewing. This ranges from the fairly innocent (I love books, therefore I write about them to spread my enthusiasm to others) to the reasonably corrupt (I love books that really matter–not the crap the NY Times thinks is important–so I aim to reward fiction that advances the art of fiction). And then, some people just like to criticize things (I love to write about what I hate).

Although most book reviews are written by freelancers for little or no money, newspapers and magazines often have staffers whose job is to review books. Beyond that, there are plenty of commercial opportunities for freelancers, even if you don’t specialize in quickies of under 200 pages for cash cows who pay more than $200 for a short review. By indulging in some tricks of the trade (reading a few pages and then cobbling together your review from quotes in the press pack), anyone can turn a buck on the book beat.

After all, the stylebook standards of reviews are child’s play. Basically, you dress up a plot summary with some toney opinionating (just go easy on the poststructuralist lingo), dangle a reservation or two, and close with a pick or a pan.

While some dream of being critics, nobody sets out to become a book reviewer. Primarily, reviewers are writers, editors, or professors who have or have had other lit projects more ambitious than review work.

Not that this means the reviews are slipshod knock-offs. The pros I know consider (reread, if necessary) an author’s previous books as well as similar books by others, seldom review books by friends or enemies, and skip rather than slam books by unknown writers.

Editors have some influence over quality, but nothing drives reviewers as effectively as the fear of hanging their asses out in public. You can toil in painstaking obscurity, cranking out reliable and incisive reviews, but if you compare Frankenstein to Gertrude Stein, you’re bound to be immortalized in a blurb.

Although experienced reviewers are better at covering their asses than beginners are, even the best ones can unwittingly look like fools. Some play the reference game. To put something in critical context, they nick so many literary luminaries that reading their reviews is like watching an arcade superstar play pinball. Others succumb to the towline effect (or its inverse, the backlash effect), where the value of the book is directly (or, inversely) proportional to the effort it took them to read and review it. Often the towline effect has a cart-pulling-the-horse dynamic (see the NY Review of Books): If the review is five times longer than it needs to be, the book must be important.

Reviewers new to the game may threaten to get personal, as they star-fuck their favorites and lay waste to their foes. This gets old fast, but generally, I think it’s good for a reviewer to have a personal stake in the book under review. Who better than an entomologist to review a book about entomology, even if she just wrote a book on the same topic?

Book review assignments may deserve another article or none at all: The topic is either too mysterious or too obvious. Everybody knows that a tiny percentage of published books get reviewed, that big names and bestsellers and commercial houses hog the ink, that tons of worthy books go undiscovered. Many suspect that reviewers despise the proliferation of books, even while the reviewers themselves feed the literary lottery pot with their own hopes to overcome the astronomical odds and win fame.

Few realize, however, that nobody determines what books get reviewed as much as the reviewers do (more through whim and inertia than through any flex of power), and that the most formidable obstacle an author wanting to be reviewed can face is the neglect or incompetence of his own publisher.

And why do people read book reviews?

So they don’t have to read books.

(Doug Nufer is an editor of and contributor to American Book Review. His book reviews have appeared in the Nation, the Seattle Times, the Oregonian, and the San Francisco Bay Guardian, and currently appear in the Stranger and Rain Taxi. He hated to write book reports in school.)

TOMORROW: What might really be behind the recent frey over movie content.

ELSEWHERE:

BURNING ON RE-ENTRY
Oct 24th, 2000 by Clark Humphrey

The Rocket, the Bible of Northwest rock for 21 years, is apparently dead. Its 10/19 issue failed to get distributed, and the Midwesterner who bought it earlier this year has suddenly laid off its 18 staffers.

The paper (it liked to call itself a magazine, but it was still on tabloid-size newsprint) maintained a quite consistent aesthetic and attitude over its long existence. It always championed graphic excellence (many of its ex-art directors and freelance designers went on to careers at “real” magazines in NYC) and tight, if sometimes bullheaded, writing (its verbal alums include John Keister, Ann Powers, Robert Ferrigno, Scott McCaughey, Gillian Gaar, Evan Sult, Bruce Pavitt, and Robert McChesney).

It always championed the regional rock scene, though it also liked to consider itself a bit more sophisticated than its milieu. Its frequent lapses into Attitude-with-a-capital-A caused no end of predictable scorn from bands that thought it didn’t write enough about them, or that it wrote about them but in an insufficiently reverent manner.

It was never exclusively local (it would put out-of-town “alternative” stars on many covers, and even had a ’60s-oldies phase in the mid-’80s). But it gave a damn about Seattle rock bands years before any other prominent print organ did (remember, there wasn’t even a Stranger until late ’91, and the Weekly didn’t give a damn about post-sixties youth).

By treating local bands as worthy of criticism, rather than something that had to be “supported” like a needy child, it performed an invaluable part toward the scene becoming what it became.

And when it did champion local acts, it did so in a way that made its suburban and out-of-town readers believe there was a bigger, more powerful Seattle rock scene than there was at the time.

It was never a great moneymaker, despite its influence. For most of the ’80s it was a thin monthly (at a time when most other big US cities had at least one real alternative weekly), dependent upon ads from recording studios and instrument stores rather than end-consumer businesses. Like certain popular but marginal restaurants, it kept going by finding new owners hoping to turn it around. It went from once to twice a month; it added a Portland edition; it toyed with restaurant and movie coverage.

In the mid-’90s, it got bought up by BAM, a California chain of similar (but squarer) papers. Shortly after that, BAM shut down its other operations; leaving The Rocket as the last colonial outpost of a vanquished empire, a la Constantinople. Earlier this year, BAM finally gave up and sold The Rocket to a Midwesterner who either didn’t realize how badly BAM had mismanaged it or mistakenly thought he could bring it back.

In the end, The Rocket’s music specialization (and its odd fortnightly schedule) may prove to be what did it in. It couldn’t compete for general nightlife and lifestyle advertising with The Stranger and a newly youth-ified Weekly, which both came out often enough to include complete movie calendars. Tablet, a new fortnightly alterna-tabloid whose second issue came out the day The Rocket announced its end, is trying to take both a more topically general and geographically specific approach (only circulating within Seattle) than The Rocket did.

But despite these specific conceptual limitations, some will undoubtedly see The Rocket’s apparent end as another sign of the Northwest music scene fading back from former glories. Don’t believe it.

The paper’s failings were all its own, and were built into its basic concept. The music scene will continue without it, as a now-mature offspring that no longer needs to be prodded into striving for its full potential.

TOMORROW: How to improve Northwest Bookfest.

IN OTHER NEWS: Instead of trying to outlaw hiphop, maybe the “family values” goons should look at those violence-inspiring boy bands!

ELSEWHERE:

NADER'S SERENADERS
Oct 23rd, 2000 by Clark Humphrey

I REALLY HAVE NO IDEA what goes on in the offices of The Stranger these days. But I’ve been told there’s apparently some internal turmoil over there about endorsing Ralph Nader for President.

According to the rumor, many of the paper’s editorial staffers want to go for Ralphie, but one or two of the top brass are hesitant. (You may recall, the Stranger endorsed Paul Schell for mayor in ’97, only to have spent the past year denouncing its onetime official hero.)

Most other alt-weeklies across the U.S. (except Seattle Weekly and the New Times chain) have shown few such qualms about Ralphie-boy. So have a smattering of “mainstream” journalists, most prominently Harper’s editor Lewis Lapham. Indeed, one Boston Globe writer has christened Nader “the candidate of crank columnists.”

Nader’s campaign also represents another plateau in the way-new left’s “new positivity,” as expressed in places like the new local alt-paper Tablet.

(At early planning meetings I sat in on, several of that paper’s punk-rock instigators renounced cynicism, proclaiming they didn’t want to define themselves solely in contrast to somebody else’s worldview. And I foolishly thought that was what punk rock used to be all about.)

It’s this positivity, this spirit that progressives can finally Get Something Done rather than just sit and mope, that’s attracted celebrity endorsers such as Eddie Vedder (who’s made a few political-type statements before but has never publicly supported a candidate for anything).

And the new positivity’s certainly part of what I’ve seen in the enthusiastic support the Nader campaign’s gotten among local lefties who, just one or two elections ago, would be proudly staying home. All over the Pike-Pine corridor, on the Ave, and anywhere else anti-corporate or anti-statist types gather, Nader’s green campaign signs and bumper stickers adorn scores of shops and poster-boards. Some of these signs ask that you vote for Nader not as a protest against the major-party candidates, but as a vote specifically for Nader’s agenda of worker rights, decentralized institutions, and checks on corporate power.

But what do I myself think of him and his candidacy, you might be asking?

He does have a number of good points in his platform (a wider and more comprehensive platform than almost any recent prominent third-party candidate).

He’s beholden to nobody, has his heart in the right place, and really would, given half a chance, try to turn this into a country where non-monetary values are treated with serious consideration.

But would I endorse him? I just might wait until the east coast votes start coming in. Then, if Gore’s making it, I’ll run to my polling spot and click for some nursing from Mr. R.N.

(Hmm, I seem to recall another Presidential candidate who once had the initials R.N., who also dressed drably and who also once promised a break from politics-as-usual. Of course, the similarities between the two completely end there. For one thing, that prior R.N. had the support of a few Democrats.)

(Oops, that last piece of facetiousness is the sort of borderline negativity hardcore Naderites wouldn’t like. Oh well, they’ll just have to live with it.)

TOMORROW: Remembering The Rocket.

ELSEWHERE:

  • Learn semiconductor physics with Britney Spears (or at least scanned photos of her)….
VIRTUAL WORLDS OF REAL PAPER
Oct 20th, 2000 by Clark Humphrey

REGULAR READERS of this page know I’ve been trying to tweak the format of the MISCmedia print magazine, trying to find that elusive formula for success (or at least non-failure).

Today, we’ll discuss a couple of the elements that, according to the experts contribute to success in the field of periodical print.

1. The virtual world created on real paper.

Even publications with few or no fiction texts create a highly selective “reality” based on what pieces of the real world they cover and the viewpoints they take toward those pieces. The result, if it’s executed properly, is an alternate reality readers can only experience through reading the magazine.

(Think of Cosmopolitan’s world of sassy young women enjoying hot careers and multiple orgasms, the pre-Steve Forbes’s world of thoughtful industrialist-philosophers, or Interview’s world of breezy starlets and fabulous fashion designers.

Many magazines also create their own “realities” via staged photo shoots, cartoons, and the like. Examples include fashion spreads, travelogue photos with pro models, and, of course, nudie pix.

Playboy took this a step further with the creation of the Playboy Mansion, in which the magazine’s fantasy world could be staged nightly for its photographers and invited guests.

2. The full-meal deal.

Legendary Saturday Evening Post editor George Lorimer once said something to the effect that a good magazine was like a good dinner. It should have an appetizing opening, a hearty main course, some delectable sides, and a fun dessert.

(I guess, by the same analogy, a good small newsletter-type publication might be like a handy, satisfying deli sandwich with chips and a Jones Soda. And a useful webzine might be like a Snickers.)

3. The clearly identifiable point of view, or “voice.”

The old New Yorker identity, in the Eustace Tilly mascot and in the writings of folk like E.B. White and co., was of a refined Old Money sensibility confronting the sound and fury of the modern urban world with a tasteful, distanced smirk.

A Seattle counterpart might be a funky-chic sensibility (think fringe theater, indie rock, and zines) confronting a sleek, bombastic, postmodern urban world with a worldly, haughty chortle. Maybe.

MONDAY: I finally get around to the Ralph Nader campaign.

OTHER WORDS (from French director Robert Bresson): “Cinema, radio, television, magazines are a school of inattention: people look without seeing, listen in without hearing.”

ELSEWHERE:

  • From the place you’d least expect it (a newspaper business section), a perfect example of old-style rat-a-tat stacatto column writing….
  • You know that guy who sometimes reviews TV preachers on The Daily Show? He used to be Joe Bob Briggs (remember him?)….
WHITHER CNN?
Oct 17th, 2000 by Clark Humphrey

WHEN I FIRST HEARD the news of the big Belgrade uprising, I instictually tuned to CNN–only to see a regularly-scheduled episode of TalkBack Live with Pat Buchanan’s and Ralph Nader’s vice-presidential running mates.

CNN’s Headline News channel had its regular briefs about medical discoveries and education reform.

CNBC had its normal stock-market wheel. MSNBC could only be bothered with updates about the situation, briefly interrupting its normal daytime-talk discussion on improving one’s parenting skills.

Only The Fox News Channel and BBC America were willing to interrupt their normal routines for the live riot footage CNN used to be known for.

CNN and MSNBC did get around, at the top of the hour, to covering the apparent downfall of Serb strongman Slobodan Milosevic. But as the day went on, they (and Fox News Channel) kept up an annoying habit of treating the most important single world-news event so far this year as a sideshow to the day’s previously scheduled “lead story”–the evening’s forthcoming debate between Dick Cheney and Joe Lieberman.

All the U.S. cable news channels under-reported the opposition takeover. But CNN seemed the most preturbed at this real-world interruption to its planned agenda.

In recent weeks, CNN has been shaken by management resignations and firings. These lead from the main CNN channel’s downward drift in the ratings. During the stock-market madness this year, CNBC has had more daytime viewers than CNN. Fox News Channel often outdraws CNN in areas where both appear (it’s still on fewer cable systems).

CNN seems today like CBS News has seemed for a while; as a slow-moving, square-thinking organization increasingly lost in a fast-moving world and a faster-moving news business. Fox News, with its outspokenly conservative talk hosts, and MSNBC, with its shameless exploiting of whatever’s the current one over-reported story (e.g. Monica Lewinsky), have let the 20-year-old CNN seem positively stodgy.

But CNN could change, if it wanted to. And it doesn’t have to wait for America Online to take over CNN’s parent company, Time Warner.

CNN could take a cue from the BBC and reinvent itself as the “class act” of the cable news biz. That won’t be cheap or quick. But it can be done. Dare to cover the big stories the other channels don’t find sexy enough. Forego the noise and smoke for more thoughtfulness.

Will they do it? We’ll have to see as the weeks and months go on.

The news continues.

TOMORROW: Fun at the High Tech Career Expo.

ELSEWHERE:

  • Naked News is just what its title implies–a daily ten-minute newscast in streaming video, delivered by nude anchorwomen….
  • From stereographs to the Commodore 64 and the Betamax, it’s all on the List of Dead Media (found by Pif)….
WHEN AM STILL RULED
Oct 2nd, 2000 by Clark Humphrey

LAST FRIDAY, I began a recollection of what Seattle was like in the fall of 1975, when I first came to the allegedly Big City after a childhood in much smaller burgs.

I’d already mentioned the only “alternative” paper at the time, The Seattle Sun; and its target audience niche, a Capitol Hill-centered clique of 25-to-35-ers who just wanted to settle down after doing whatever they’d done in The Sixties.

The mainstream media in town were also fairly tame at the time.

The Seattle Times, still an afternoon paper, was still as wide as the Wall Street Journal and as plain-looking as a cheap suburban tract house. It always ran a half-page photo on Page 3, which was almost always of a dog or Mount Rainier. Its features section, then called “View,” had many cute stories about somebody doing something important who was–gasp–a woman!

The P-I, meanwhile, was a feisty archrival to the Times in those pre-Joint-Operating-Agreement days (well, except for the editorials, which usually touted the same Chamber of Commerce party line). It still had some of that old Hearstian spunk in it; at least in the sports pages, which were then mostly about the Sonics, college sports, and out-of-town stuff. There were no Mariners or Seahawks yet; though the P-I’s lovable geezer Royal Brougham (who’d been at the paper since WWI) was already drumming up oldtime rah-rah support for our soon-to-be local heroes.

Local TV was a far different animal then than now. Newscasts were heavy on in-studio commentators and grainy 16mm film. Portable video cameras were just being introduced, and were largely used as gimmicks (as they mostly still are). That meant a lot of interviews, press conferences, and staged media events (held before 1 p.m. so the film could be edited by 5); interspersed with a few of the fires and police chases that now dominate local newscasts across the country.

And there was still a good deal of non-news local TV. J.P. Patches and Gertrude still ran a bizarre, funky kiddie show on KIRO, whose influence on the local theatrical and performance scenes lasted for decades. KING had morning and evening talk shows, providing endless interview slots to all the itinerant book-pluggers crisscrossing the nation. KOMO had a “religious program” called Strength for These Days, which ran at 5:45 a.m. weekdays and consisted entirely of the same film footage of ocean waves and windblown trees every day, accompanied by choir music.

Seattle radio was an even odder beast. For one thing, AM stations still dominated.

For the grownups, KVI’s dynamic eccentrics Bob Hardwick and Jack Morton engaged a spirited ratings battle against KOMO’s personable square Larry Nelson and KIRO’s fledgling news-talk format.

For the kids, KVI and KING-AM played an odd top-40 melange of anything that happened to be popular (Dolly Parton, Lynard Skynard, Helen Reddy, Barry White, Edgar Winter, Tony Orlando, Donny Osmond).

For the older kids, the FM band found KISW and KZOK blasting Led Zeppelin, AC/DC and their metal brethern out to Camaro-drivin’ teens from Spanaway to Stanwood.

The UW, meanwhile, had a little FM operation, KUOW, which played blocks of classical music (competing with the then-commercial KING-FM) and that newfangled network newscast with those really soft-talking announcers. (The U also ran a smaller operation, KCMU, as a laboratory for broadcast-communications students to play Grateful Dead songs and mumble their way through the weather report.)

And there was an honest-to-goodness radical community station, KRAB-FM. Its announcers often hemmed and hawed their way through a set list, but they played everything from Thai pop to big-band to political folk. It had talk blocks, too: Vietnamese children’s fables, classical lit, rambling speeches by already-aging hippie celebrities about why Those Kids Today had become too apathetic. KRAB stumbled through internal politics and mismanagement until 1984. Its frequency is now occupied by KNDD.)

TOMORROW: The Seattle arts scene at the time.

IN OTHER NEWS: Here’s a fun rumor for all you conspiracy theorists (which I’m not): Could OPEC countries be scheming to raise oil prices and engender U.S. voter restlessness against Gore/Lieberman? (found by Progressive Review)

ELSEWHERE:

THAT '70S COLUMN
Sep 29th, 2000 by Clark Humphrey

‘TWAS A QUARTER-CENTURY AGO THIS MONTH that yr. humble reporter first settled in the Jet City, embarking upon adulthood after a forgettable adolescence in smaller places.

With all the hype these days about ’70s nostalgia (or was that already over by 1998?) and all the talk these days about the monstrously “World Class” burg Seattle’s become, it’s a good time to look back upon the Seattle of 1975.

Even then, the municipal cliches and cliques still plaguing us now were in force. There were the business boosters out to make us a Big League City (the Kingdome was under construction on the site of a disused railroad yard).

There were the grumblers who blamed Californian newcomers for ruining everything, who bitched at the “provincial” ways of the folk already here, or both. There were other grumblers who said Seattle was too much like Los Angeles, not enough like San Francisco, or both.

There were the folks still in their late ’20s who seemed to feel that their real lives had already ended with the end of “The Sixties,” and who saw the verdant Northwest as a place to live out their remaining years in smug contentment. There were young proto-punks who craved passion and excitement, and who naturally loathed their elders who demanded an entire city devoted to peace and quiet.

Downtown Seattle’s transformation had begun seven years before with the Seafirst Tower (now the 1000 4th Avenue Tower), and was well underway by ’75. Freeway Park and the first phase of the Convention Center had been built. But thre were still plenty of blocks of two- to six-story brick and terra-cotta buildings. The most stately of these, the White-Henry-Stuart building, was being demolished for the tapered-bottomed Rainier Bank Tower (now Rainier Squre).

Nordstrom had expanded from a shoe store into a half-block collection of boutiques, and had instituted its infamous sales-force-as-religious-cult motivational system (later imitated at Microsoft and Amazon.com). Frederick & Nelson was still the grand dame of local dept. stores; J.C. Penney still had its biggest-in-the-company store where the Newmark tower is now.

Also still downtown: Florsheim, Woolworth, the old Westlake Bartell Drugs (with a soda fountain), and a host of locally-owned little restaurants, some with dark little cocktail lounges in the back.

The “Foodie” revolution in the restaurant biz had begun, and Seattle was one of its strongest outposts. Because the Washington Liquor Board demanded that all cocktail lounges have a restaurant in front, and that those restaurant-lounges earn at least 40 percent of their revenue from food sales, operators were constantly scrambling for the latest foodie fad–French, fusion, Thai, penne pollo, nouvelle cuisine, pan-Asian, sushi, organic, and that “traditional Northwest cuisine” that was just being invented at the time (mostly by Californian chefs).

And in the U District, a little alleyway-entranced outfit called Cafe Allegro had just begun serving up espresso drinks to all-nighter exam-crammers; while Starbucks’ handful of coffee-bean stores had already been promoting European-style coffee to Caucasian office warriors. One of Starbucks’ founders, Gordon Bowker, would later help start Seattle Weekly and Redhook Ale.

There was no Weekly yet; but there was a small weekly opinion journal for movers-and-shakers called the Argus, which had just been sold by Olympic Stain mogul Philip Bailey to the Queen Anne News chain of neighborhood papers. There was also the Seattle Sun, a struggling little alterna-weekly which ran, between neighborhood-vs.-developer articles and reviews of the latest Bonnie Raitt LP, some of Lynda Barry’s first cartoons.

MONDAY: A little more of this; including the old sleaze district, the daily papers, the TV, the economy, entertainment, the arts, and politics.

IN OTHER NEWS: Some local Green Party candidates don’t get to share the stage at the big Ralph Nader rallies.

ELSEWHERE:

»  Substance:WordPress   »  Style:Ahren Ahimsa
© Copyright 1986-2025 Clark Humphrey (clark (at) miscmedia (dotcom)).