It's here! It's here! All the local news headlines you need to know about, delivered straight to your e-mail box and from there to your little grey brain.
Learn more about it here.
Sign up at the handy link below.
CLICK HERE to get on board with your very own MISCmedia MAIL subscription!
BLACK ENTERTAINMENT TELEVISION was seldom among the proudest examples of African American cultural achievement.
Its schedule relied heavily on music-video blocks, including a lot of the gun-totin’ and woman-dissin’ gangsta minstrels manufactured by L.A. promoters for mall-rat consumption. Its original shows were heavy on the kind of self-deprecating comedy acts that Spike Lee savages in his new movie Bamboozled. And it ran as much as 12 hours a day of infomercials.
But black audiences were often willing to give the channel at least a little grudging respect, because it was “their own.” It was officially owned by a black entrepreneur, Robert Johnson. (Even though its financing and ultimate control came from TCI’s Liberty Media subsidiary.)
But AT&T, which now controls Liberty, has been involved in some major corporate reorganizing; while Johnson’s tried to start a new commuter airline.
So BET will soon disappear as a nominally independent entity, to become just another of Viacom’s many cable properties.
Some commentators have mourned that the only black-owned national TV channel’s going to be just another piece of a media conglomerate.
What they’re not fully considering is that a Viacom-owned BET just might be a more effective voice for black America. Not just with more and costlier original shows, but with a more respectful atittude toward its core audience.
Viacom’s MTV and UPN channels have certainly traded in the kind of jive talk and booty shakes vilified by BET’s critics. But its Showtime pay-TV channel has commissioned perhaps the most respectful black-middle-class show since Cosby, Soul Food (and its Hispanic counterpart, Resurrection Boulevard).
These shows, along with HBO’s The Corner, expand the notion of “TV Worth Paying For.” Those with just plain old broadcast reception get Af-Am role models limited to over-the-top sitcom mugging and Oprah. Those with basic cable can also see Li’l Kim’s cleavage, Wyclef’s loverboy posturing, and CNN’s Bernard Shaw.
But for the adventures of more-or-less ordinary black families with more-or-less ordinary relationship and career problems, ya gotta pay extra.
Maybe, just maybe, that’ll change.
TOMORROW: Bjork’s dander in the dark.
REMEMBER: It’s time to compile the highly awaited MISCmedia In/Out List for 2001. Make your nominations to clark@speakeasy.org or on our handy MISCtalk discussion boards.
ELSEWHERE:
Generation S&M, Part 2
by guest columnist Charlotte Quinn
(YESTERDAY, our guest columnist began musing about the ’90s revival of bondage fetishism in pop culture, and some of its possible sources. Her conclusion: A generation had come of age after growing up with Catwoman and Emma Peel.)
MY GENERATION was the first generation raised in front of the television.
Suddenly there were shows geared just towards us. Our moms bought us the new TV dinners, then set us in front of the tube while they went to their ESP development class.
And it wasn’t just The Partridge Family and Leave It to Beaver reruns we ate with breakfast, lunch, and dinner too. We’re talking some pretty heavy sexual-revolution morsels from the ’60s. Things even too risque for today’s TV.
I’m talking Catwoman, in full dominitrix gear, playfully torturing Batman. Sure, she was evil, but she was sort of doing Batman a favor by punishing him. I was five and I understood that.
Then there was I Dream of Jeannie, a scantily clad Barbara Eden dressed like a Turkish concubine who called a guy “Master.” (Impossible on today’s television.)
On Bewitched, Samantha was cheesily nice, but did you ever catch her evil twin sister Serena, the dominitrix? Between changing Darren into various livestock, she always had something vicious to say to her sister and just about anyone else around.
Emma Peel, in tight leather, karate-chopped men and always had the upper hand on Steed.
These were the women who raised me while my mom was at work. Me and my friends couldn’t swear by oath because it was against our religion, so we would say, “Do you swear to Catwoman?” If you lied on that one, we all knew you would go straight to hell.
In the ’70s, suddenly schools couldn’t make us cut our hair, pray or even insist we pledge allegiance to the flag. Just when we wanted Catwoman for a teacher, gone was the enticing restraint of the ’50s. All that work from the women’s libbers paid off, too; they couldn’t stop us from joining the army, cutting our hair, wearing pants and completely desexing ourselves.
We could do anything we wanted, and boy were we bored.
Our parents were all divorced and “finding themselves,” repeating Stuart Smalley-type self-affirmation mantras in the bathroom mirror, or smoking a joint; so they were too busy to give us any discipline.
In rebellion, my classmates starting getting born-again all over the place, finding the rigid moral confines of the fundamentalist church comforting.
In comparison, punk rock and S&M were sane alternatives. Not only did S&M give us something to bounce off of for once, but it made sex illicit, exciting, unnatural, and deviant. We could finally get that disapproving look from our society that we had waited for all those years.
The end of S&M as we know it: Now, of course, it is not so risque to be a dominitrix. it’s no longer considered deviant. In fact they even have advocacy groups and support groups.
In the ’80s, as a sociology student, I watched a “sexual deviancy” film. There was the prostitute, the nymphomaniac, the transsexual etc., and of course, the dominatrix. She was pitifully tame. Nowadays they would have to take her out of the film.
And the ’70s have come back into style–not only clothes-wise, but suddenly the 20-year-olds stopped wearing makeup and everyone thinks they have ESP or are a witch. N’Sync and the Backstreet Boys are singing some really sugary-sweet stuff that is as barfable as Barry Manilow. Madonna traded in her tight leather corsets for that flowy polyester look.
Sex looks boring again; or at least I wouldn’t find it enticing to do the dirty with the anorexic, bell-bottom-wearing, self-loving, and self-affirming teenyboppers out there. I mean, do Ricky Martin and Matt Damon really look at all dangerous?
I guess I will just have to wait 20 years or so to have any fun.
Or maybe I’ll just ignore that S&M is no longer chic.
That would be SO Catwoman of me!
TOMORROW: A blowhard gets his comeuppance and refuses to admit it.
IN OTHER NEWS: The three U.S. news magazines often share the same cover-story topic, but rarely have Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News & World Report all used the exact same cover image, with two of the three using the same banner headline.
Generation S&M, Part 1
THE OTHER DAY I was surprised to see a preview to the new movie Quills, a tale loosely based on facts about the Marquis de Sade.
Surprised because I thought that S&M was out. The movie is complete with a star-studded Hollywood cast and lots of flogging.
Some fads go out slowly, occasionally bobbing their heads aggressively before drowning completely. You can’t really write a fair essay about a fad until it’s over. You have to give it time to die, and God knows you don’t know a fad is happening while you’re in it. No one knew the roaring ’20s were roaring until at least the ’50s.
So it’s stupid for me to reminisce about S&M and the glorious late ’90s yet, but I’m doing it anyway.
S&M made a comeback in the early ’90s. I heard someone once say that Seattle was some sort of Centre de Sadism renowned throughout the world. I don’t really think so.
I mean, of course there was the Vogue, which started having Sunday fetish nights in the nineties. Then the Catwalk, where you could playfully whip boys in leather, a few underground S&M raves that were hard to avoid if you ever danced.
There was even a more serious bordello/dungeon of sorts in Magnolia. The torturous Jim Rose Circus Side Show and The Pleasure Elite originated here. Still, I never thought of Seattle as an epicenter for S&M.
I did notice that suddenly S&M was cool. People were wearing corsets and spiked heels and dog collars again and suddenly black rubber was everywhere. People were “coming out” about their sexual strangeness. The personals started being really entertaining with all the weird fetishes. Post-grunge fashion picked up on the trend.
The S&M love story by Anne Rice, Exit to Eden, was made into a (crappy) Hollywood movie. Xena: Warrior Princess started kicking the shit out of men; as did Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Catwoman, and Lara Croft the cyberbabe.
Obvious dominitrixes like Miss Parker of The Profiler came back to TV. The Gimp appeared in Pulp Fiction; vampires made a comeback; Clinton was elected (and everyone knows he’s a bottom).
When you write an essay about a fad, like for example the slew of Vietnam movies made in the late ’80s or the preppy movement of the early ’80s, or even anorexia nervosa, you have to say what were the factors that allowed the fad to be.
Like for example, a lot of preppy kids had these cool ex-hippie, pro-pot, pro-everything parents, and the only way suitable for them to rebel was to change their name to Buffy and buy stocks and iron their clothes. Works for me.
Much the same thing happened with S&M.
Everyone knows that our parents raised us in the ’70s and they were into the most hideous, revolting, normal sex.
Encounter groups, est, Unitarian Church Singles Groups (called USAG). I’m OK, You’re OK. The Show Me! book, the anatomically correct dolls. The ’70s, when people sang “I’m Easy” and “Sometimes When We Touch” with a straight face.
Yeeech. Blek.
Our parents’ sex, although “open” and “free”, bored us all to tears. I mean, Alan Alda and Woody Allen as sex symbols?
While their twenties were spent rebelling against the sexual repression of their ’50s-era parents, our twenties were spent trying to re-achieve the coolness of repression.
And I think I personally found it in Catwoman.
TOMORROW: A possible source of S&M fascination–’60s sitcoms.
IN A SHORT-SHORT FICTION PIECE I haven’t uploaded to this site yet, I once imagined some potential Playboy magazine nudie features of the future: “America’s Sexiest Female CEOs,” “America’s Sexiest Female Judges,” “America’s Sexiest Congresswomen,” etc.
One I skipped: “America’s Sexiest Anchorwomen.”
It’s an odd omission. TV stations and networks have been hiring pretty ladies to share anchor desks with hairspray boys for decades. (One of Seattle’s most memorable, Sandy Hill, was an ex-Miss Washington who wound up co-hosting every newscast on the station from noon to 11 pm, before becoming Joan Lunden’s predecessor on Good Morning America.)
All this talk is a lead-in to discussing a peculiar softcore-fetish website, The Naked News.
It’s a 15-minute streaming video newscast, with a new edition each weekday. While it has no field reporters or on-the-scene footage, its four Toronto-based studio anchors read competently-written briefs headlining the day’s news, weather, and sports.
All the anchors are young women. All of them either appear on camera fully nude, or strip from dress-for-success outfits until they’re wearing only their microphones.
The concept’s borrowed from a Russian program that appears on regular TV over there. That show’s bare news readers have occasionally even staged (nude) on-location interviews with (clothed) major government officials.
The American Naked News anchors all keep straight, tho’ perky, faces during their readings. Their only variation from standard newsreader behavior is a short rump-wiggling walkoff at the conclusion of their segments. Their faces, hair styles, and (when they have any) costumes are standard-issue anchorwoman style, not stripper or porn-star or dominatrix style. If not for their perfect (perhaps surgically perfected) figures, they could be the sort of women a young-adult male Internet user might work alongside–or for.
Their straightforward demeanor also differentiates The Naked News from the constant, screeching hard-sell tactics common to sex sites. The streaming video contains commercials, but they’re relatively tame ones (for other entertainment websites). The site’s lack of constant selling is just as relieving as its lack of hardcore crudeness.
None of this means many female Net users would enjoy viewing The Naked News, or even approve of its existence.
The site’s stars might be pronounced non-bimbos, and they might project in-charge images, but they’re still portraying male fantasies, performing to be stared at.
To such potential critics, I might say that heterosexuality has always been with us and likely always will be. As long as most het-male brains are wired to respond to visual stimuli, such stimuli will be produced. They might as well be stimuli that emphasize beauty over crudity, with at least a modicum of brains and humor and friendliness.
And while The Naked News may be a trifle, a light-entertainment novelty work, it’s really no more entertainment-oriented than many news and “reality” shows on broadcast TV. (And it’s no less journalistically respectable than some of them either.)
IN OTHER NEWS: The first strikebound editions of the Seattle Times and Post-Intelligencer came out yesterday. They’re flimsy li’l 24-page things, full of wire copy, syndicated columns, and database features (weather, TV listings).
Because they were printed even earlier in the day than Tuesday’s last pre-strike papers, they didn’t include any evening sports results, stock listings, or even the Florida Supreme Court’s Presidential-recount ruling. Classified ads were truncated on a quota basis, unseen since the days of WWII paper rationing.
The result: Morning papers you didn’t need all day to read. A partial vindication for my long-held wish for a brisker, more immediate, even “alternative” daily; the sort of concept that could potentially bring true competition to the print-news biz and dislodge the local-monopoly papers such as those currently being struck.
(More strike news, and new material by picketing newshacks, is at The Seattle Union Record.
IN OTHER OTHER NEWS: George Clark, who’s self-published several occasional parodies of The Stranger and The Weekly over the years (so typographically accurate, many readers originally thought the Stranger staff had actually produced them!), has issued another, spoofing both tabloids in a double-cover format. The issue seems to have been in the works for some time; it contains parodies of features The Stranger hasn’t carried for two years or more (including my old section, cutely relabeled “Miscellanal”).
TOMORROW: Some things I actually like.
THERE’S FINALLY A TARGET STORE in Seattle. The chain had previously dotted the suburbs, but came no closer to town than Westwood Village, a strip mall on the cusp between West Seattle and White Center.
Now, the “hip” discount department store (which has encouraged its fans to use the faux-French designation “Tar-szhay”) has set up shop in a new development across from Northgate–the historic “Mall That Started It All” where, 50 years ago, the then-parent company of the Bon Marche devised a centralized, all-enveloping shopping experience, separated by a giant moat of parking lots from the outside world.
In contrast, the new Northgate North development, where Target is, was planned in cooperation with city officials who wanted an “urban village” scheme–higher-density development, with leftover space for new residential units.
Therefore, the new Target’s 80,000 square feet (the chain’s standard store size) are cut up into two floors of a building that directly abuts the sidewalk (though you have to enter from the back, next to the five-story parking garage). Target’s on the building’s upper two floors. The ground floor’s devoted to smaller chains with storefront entrances (not open yet). On the lower level: Best Buy, the electronics/appliance/CD chain that once ran a national TV ad promoting itself as the best place to catch up on that then-hot “Seattle Sound,” even though it didn’t have any outlets in the area at the time.
The building itself’s done up in that currently popular retro-“industrial” style. Lotsa exposed framework and corrugated aluminum cladding give off a “busy” and quasi-friendly look, rather than the overpowering nothingness of big blank concrete walls.
The Target store was worth the wait, and suggests the chain should’ve built in-town sooner. While Kmart constructed its merchandising for suburban squares, and Wal-Mart was devised to be Small Town America’s everything-for-everybody store, Target applied niche marketing (also known as “target marketing”) to what had been a mass-marketing genre. Like Ikea, it sought out young-adult singles and new families with more style than cash. From shoes to lingerie, from kids’ coats to tableware, from home-office furniture to home-entertainment centers, what Target’s got is at least a little cooler (and not much costlier) than the stuff at the other big-box chains.
This strategy dates to the chain’s origins. As the chain’s website notes, it’s the only national discount chain to have been started by “department store people, not dime store people.” Specifically, it was started by Dayton Hudson Co., owners of Dayton’s dept. store in Minneapolis (where Mary Tyler Moore flung her hat). Target has now become more important to Dayton Hudson than its collection of regional dept.-store chains; the parent company recently changed its official name to Target Corp. When family scion Mark Dayton won a U.S. Senate election this month, most commentators referred to him as “heir to the Target fortune.”
Indeed, the brand’s become so powerful that the company was able to run commercials earlier this year with rave DJs and hot-panted dancers cavorting around backdrops of the chain’s bull’s-eye logo, with no products being sold and the store’s name not even mentioned.
TOMORROW: Another of our little fiction pieces.
IN OTHER NEWS: There’s a movie out there this week with a supposed anti-materialism message, that has lots of merchandising tie-ins with Nabisco, Hasbro, Visa, the Post Office, and more. Here’s a review, in Seussesque verse.
SHORT STUFF TODAY, starting with another dare received on an email list.
A WILD BORE: Nickelodeon recently debuted Pelswick, a cartoon series created by our favorite Portland paraplegic satirist John Callahan. Its hero is a 13-year-old boy, who just happens to use a wheelchair.
One emailer on one of the lists I’m on noted that, not too long ago, such a character situation would never have been deemed an appropriate topic for a children’s light-entertainment series. This correspondent also asked if anyone could “name a subject that isn’t at least potentially entertaining.”
Here’s what I came up with:
(On the other hand, a drawn-out, never-concluding Presidential election is about as much fun as one can have with one’s garments currently being worn.)
YOU ROCK, ‘GRL’!: Media reaction to the ROCKRGRL Music Conference, Seattle’s biggest alterna-music confab in five years, was nothing if not predictable.
Before the conference, the big papers described it as an attempt to get a “women in rock” movement back on track after the end of Lilith Fair (which was really an acoustic singer-songwriter touring show, and which had included almost no nonsinging female instrumentalists).
During the conference, the papers tried to brand everyone in it as reverse-sexists, out to denounce “the male dominated music industry” and anything or anyone with a Y chromosome. Many of the speakers and interviewees, however, declined to fall in line with this preconceived line. Some at the panel discussions took time to thank husbands, boyfriends, band members, and other XY-ers who’ve supported their work. Others in interviews insisted their musical influences and life heroes weren’t as gender-specific as the interviewers had hoped. (Even at the discussion about violent “fans,” someone noted that stalkers and attackers can be anyone (cf. the Selena tragedy).)
And as for the music industry, it’s not built on gender but on money and power games; games which routinely prove disastrous for maybe 80 percent of male artists and 90 percent of female artists. (We’ll talk a little more about this tomorrow.)
THE END OF SOMETHING BIG: Saw Game Show Network’s hour-long tribute to Steve Allen a couple weeks back. Was reminded of how, seeing one of his last talk shows as a teenager, he was briefly my idol. He did silly things; he always kept the proceedings moving briskly. He also wrote fiction and nonfiction books, plays, and thousands of songs.
Of course, nobody remembers any of the songs, except the one he used as his own theme song. And the books and plays were essentially forgettable trifles. His main work was simply being funny on TV, and he was able to do it on and off for nearly 50 years.
As for his latter-day involvement with a right-wing pro-censorship lobby, you have to remember he was the son of vaudeville performers and was steeped in the old American secular religion of Wholesome Entertainment. To him, the past two or three decades’ worth of cultural bad boys and girls probably didn’t really represent a “moral sewer” but a mass heresy against what, to him, had been the One True Faith.
THE MARKETPLACE-O-IDEAS: The NY Times reports about some American leftist economists (including James Tobin, Jeremy Rifkin, and Bruce Ackerman) who’ve found an appreciative and excited audience for their ideas–in Europe.
You can think of it as the socio-philosophical equivalent of those U.S. alterna-music bands that could only get record contracts overseas.
You can also think of it as another of the unplanned effects of cultural globalization. Even avid opponents of a world system ruled by U.S. corporations are taking their ideas from Americans.
TOMORROW: Apres Napster, le deluge.
REGULAR READERS of this page know I’ve been trying to tweak the format of the MISCmedia print magazine, trying to find that elusive formula for success (or at least non-failure).
Today, we’ll discuss a couple of the elements that, according to the experts contribute to success in the field of periodical print.
1. The virtual world created on real paper.
Even publications with few or no fiction texts create a highly selective “reality” based on what pieces of the real world they cover and the viewpoints they take toward those pieces. The result, if it’s executed properly, is an alternate reality readers can only experience through reading the magazine.
(Think of Cosmopolitan’s world of sassy young women enjoying hot careers and multiple orgasms, the pre-Steve Forbes’s world of thoughtful industrialist-philosophers, or Interview’s world of breezy starlets and fabulous fashion designers.
Many magazines also create their own “realities” via staged photo shoots, cartoons, and the like. Examples include fashion spreads, travelogue photos with pro models, and, of course, nudie pix.
Playboy took this a step further with the creation of the Playboy Mansion, in which the magazine’s fantasy world could be staged nightly for its photographers and invited guests.
2. The full-meal deal.
Legendary Saturday Evening Post editor George Lorimer once said something to the effect that a good magazine was like a good dinner. It should have an appetizing opening, a hearty main course, some delectable sides, and a fun dessert.
(I guess, by the same analogy, a good small newsletter-type publication might be like a handy, satisfying deli sandwich with chips and a Jones Soda. And a useful webzine might be like a Snickers.)
3. The clearly identifiable point of view, or “voice.”
The old New Yorker identity, in the Eustace Tilly mascot and in the writings of folk like E.B. White and co., was of a refined Old Money sensibility confronting the sound and fury of the modern urban world with a tasteful, distanced smirk.
A Seattle counterpart might be a funky-chic sensibility (think fringe theater, indie rock, and zines) confronting a sleek, bombastic, postmodern urban world with a worldly, haughty chortle. Maybe.
MONDAY: I finally get around to the Ralph Nader campaign.
OTHER WORDS (from French director Robert Bresson): “Cinema, radio, television, magazines are a school of inattention: people look without seeing, listen in without hearing.”
TODAY’S MISCmedia is dedicated to the memory of Julie London, the former B-movie actress who was turned into the prototypical lounge singer by second husband Bobby Troup; then was hired, with Troup, by first husband Jack Webb to star in his TV show Emergency. We’re all crying a river over you, Julie.
MORE LITTLE ANECDOTES inspired by real estate. This time, memories of rock joints of the recent past.
Linda’s Tavern opened in early 1994 on the site of what had been the Ali Baba restaurant. Four years earlier, the Ali Baba had hosted some of the first freak-show performances by former pest-control salesman Jim Rose (advertised with word-heavy flyers headlined “He Is NOT A Geek”). Shortly after Linda’s opened, the Ali Baba sign became part of a shrine to Rose and his “sick circus.” The shrine wasn’t at Linda’s but at Moe’s Mo’Rockin’ Cafe, at the present site of ARO.Space.
The Kincora Pub is in one of those buildings that’s had umpteen different identites. In the ’70s and early ’80s it was Glynn’s Cove, one of Capitol Hill’s last true dive bars. Then it was the live-music club Squid Row, which (after a failed jazz-fusion format) emerged in 1987 as one of the few places to hear those loud, slow rock bands everybody in America would soon think was the only kind of rock band in Seattle. (Things got so loud iin there, the doors could only be opened between songs to appease the neighbors.) More recently it was Tugs Belmont, successor to the still fondly-remembered pioneering gay dance club Tugs Belltown.
The Vogue, dean of Seattle dance clubs, now resides within the DJ-circuit neighborhood on Capitol Hill anchored by ARO.Space. Its former site on First Avenue, seen here, still stands vacant after more than a year. It had first opened as a leather gay bar in the mid-’70s; then in late 1979 became Wrex, one of the first joints in town devoted to that new wave/punk/whatever-you-called-it music. It became the Vogue in 1983, pioneering a post-disco, not-exclusively-gay dance shtick (including the town’s longest running fetish night). It still hosted live acts on off nights, including Nirvana’s first Seattle gig in 1988.
The Hopvine Pub on 15th Ave. E. was once a somewhat more rough-hewn joint called the Five-O Tavern. The Five-O had hosted blisteringly-loud rock gigs in the mid-’80s. Even after noise complaints stopped those shows, it remained a hangout for young-adult heteros at a time when most other Capitol Hill bars were either gay or yuppie. It’s now a finely-appointed microbrew joint, but still attracts some of the ex-Five-O crowd, with singer-songwriter gigs by the likes of Pete Krebs and Marc Olsen.
TOMORROW: Secrets for making a magazine catch on.
WHEN I FIRST HEARD the news of the big Belgrade uprising, I instictually tuned to CNN–only to see a regularly-scheduled episode of TalkBack Live with Pat Buchanan’s and Ralph Nader’s vice-presidential running mates.
CNN’s Headline News channel had its regular briefs about medical discoveries and education reform.
CNBC had its normal stock-market wheel. MSNBC could only be bothered with updates about the situation, briefly interrupting its normal daytime-talk discussion on improving one’s parenting skills.
Only The Fox News Channel and BBC America were willing to interrupt their normal routines for the live riot footage CNN used to be known for.
CNN and MSNBC did get around, at the top of the hour, to covering the apparent downfall of Serb strongman Slobodan Milosevic. But as the day went on, they (and Fox News Channel) kept up an annoying habit of treating the most important single world-news event so far this year as a sideshow to the day’s previously scheduled “lead story”–the evening’s forthcoming debate between Dick Cheney and Joe Lieberman.
All the U.S. cable news channels under-reported the opposition takeover. But CNN seemed the most preturbed at this real-world interruption to its planned agenda.
In recent weeks, CNN has been shaken by management resignations and firings. These lead from the main CNN channel’s downward drift in the ratings. During the stock-market madness this year, CNBC has had more daytime viewers than CNN. Fox News Channel often outdraws CNN in areas where both appear (it’s still on fewer cable systems).
CNN seems today like CBS News has seemed for a while; as a slow-moving, square-thinking organization increasingly lost in a fast-moving world and a faster-moving news business. Fox News, with its outspokenly conservative talk hosts, and MSNBC, with its shameless exploiting of whatever’s the current one over-reported story (e.g. Monica Lewinsky), have let the 20-year-old CNN seem positively stodgy.
But CNN could change, if it wanted to. And it doesn’t have to wait for America Online to take over CNN’s parent company, Time Warner.
CNN could take a cue from the BBC and reinvent itself as the “class act” of the cable news biz. That won’t be cheap or quick. But it can be done. Dare to cover the big stories the other channels don’t find sexy enough. Forego the noise and smoke for more thoughtfulness.
Will they do it? We’ll have to see as the weeks and months go on.
The news continues.
TOMORROW: Fun at the High Tech Career Expo.
THE POKEMON FAD might be fading fast, but it’s still a useful metaphor for much of human society. The Japanese-invented cartoon universe of 151 cute “Pocket Monsters” is, like many anime creations, much more complex and layered than U.S.-devised kiddie fare.
Thus, its characters can even be used to symbolize the U.S. Presidential election.
Herewith, our first-ever “Poke-President” guide:
AL GORE: The perfect Poke-world stand-in for Droning Al is Jigglypuff– the wide-eyed Pokemon who defeats its opponents by singing a lovely song that puts them all to sleep. Jigglypuff thinks its song is merely beautiful; when all other Pokes and humans go snoozin’ as a result, it takes out a felt-tip pen and draws scornful patterns on their faces. Sort of like a policy wonk chiding us for not fully appreciating his 151-point economic platforms.
GEORGE W. BUSH: Most perfectly represented by the cross-eyed Psyduck. This Poke-critter attempts to disable its fighting foes by sending out a psychic “confusion attack,” only to usually end up making itself too confused to even know which way it’s going. It’s even capable of staring itself down in a reflecting pond to the point of paralysis. Still, it’s cuddly and sympathetic in its usually pathetic attempts to hold its own in the arena of combat.
PAT BUCHANAN: There are several bad-guy Poke-critters who could symbolize our aging borderline-bigot, but the most appropriate is Koffing. This Pokemon floats through the air to launch a lethal “smokescreen attack”–subjecting the other Pokemon (and its own trainers) with an unbreathable cloud of thick black smoke. Thus, it’s a perfect match for Pat, who (heart symbols) big polluters and is always blowing a lot of hot air.
RALPH NADER: Fighting Ralph’s most apropos Poke-counterpart is the fire-breathing Charizard. One of the most powerful good-guy Pokemon, Charizard’s a never-say die competitor–when there’s a truly important cause at stake. But it can’t be bothered to take part in the commercialized nonsense of organized Pokemon cockfighting (the Poke-world’s counterpart to organized sports, and hence a great metaphor for the meaningless gamesmanship rites of organized politics). When asked to combat just for the sake of combatting, it will blow flames in the face of its would-be trainers and go back to sleep.
TOMORROW: On the Sound Transit commuter train.
LAST FRIDAY AND ALL THIS WEEK, I’ve been reminiscing about Seattle during the fall of 1975.
I’d arrived in town in September of that year after a childhood spent in Olympia and Marysville, WA and Corvallis, OR. I didn’t know what I was going to do with my life, except cease living with my parents and stay the heck out of the military.
Within two days I’d found what would now be called a “mother-in-law” apartment in Wallingford (in a home run by a devout Catholic couple with a Mary shrine in the front yard; within a year, they got a brand-new Betamax VCR equipped with “Swedish Erotica” tapes.) Days later, I got a graveyard-shift job at the U District Herfy’s (a once locally-prominent burger chain; that particular branch is now a Burger King).
I hadn’t many career expectations at the time. Writing was something I seemed to be good at, but I also could see myself in acting, local TV, music, retail, graphic design, even bike-messengering (which I wound up doing for a while).
Some of my initial memories:
Metro Transit. I’d grown up with school buses, but hadn’t lived in a jurisdiction with municipal bus service. How convenient! You just stand in one spot for as long as half an hour and you’ll get anywhere you want to go (except some really obscure places or places out in the ‘burbs).
That fall, a weekly Carson rerun would be replaced by a new show, initially titled NBC’s Saturday Night. The contrast only made Carson’s shtick seem even dumber (but in an endearing sorta way).
(My teenage encounters with the fundamentalist-Christian universe had already taught me to beware those who claimed they were the only ones going to Heaven on the basis of picayune doctrinal trivia.)
All in all, it was a time of diminished expectations, of a big city that still, mistakenly, thought it was a helpless little cowtown.
Despite everything that’s happenned for the better around here since then, and there’s been a lot, I miss something of that funky humility.
MONDAY: Back to the future with the simplest, stupidest business motivation book ever written.
LAST FRIDAY, I began a recollection of what Seattle was like in the fall of 1975, when I first came to the allegedly Big City after a childhood in much smaller burgs.
I’d already mentioned the only “alternative” paper at the time, The Seattle Sun; and its target audience niche, a Capitol Hill-centered clique of 25-to-35-ers who just wanted to settle down after doing whatever they’d done in The Sixties.
The mainstream media in town were also fairly tame at the time.
The Seattle Times, still an afternoon paper, was still as wide as the Wall Street Journal and as plain-looking as a cheap suburban tract house. It always ran a half-page photo on Page 3, which was almost always of a dog or Mount Rainier. Its features section, then called “View,” had many cute stories about somebody doing something important who was–gasp–a woman!
The P-I, meanwhile, was a feisty archrival to the Times in those pre-Joint-Operating-Agreement days (well, except for the editorials, which usually touted the same Chamber of Commerce party line). It still had some of that old Hearstian spunk in it; at least in the sports pages, which were then mostly about the Sonics, college sports, and out-of-town stuff. There were no Mariners or Seahawks yet; though the P-I’s lovable geezer Royal Brougham (who’d been at the paper since WWI) was already drumming up oldtime rah-rah support for our soon-to-be local heroes.
Local TV was a far different animal then than now. Newscasts were heavy on in-studio commentators and grainy 16mm film. Portable video cameras were just being introduced, and were largely used as gimmicks (as they mostly still are). That meant a lot of interviews, press conferences, and staged media events (held before 1 p.m. so the film could be edited by 5); interspersed with a few of the fires and police chases that now dominate local newscasts across the country.
And there was still a good deal of non-news local TV. J.P. Patches and Gertrude still ran a bizarre, funky kiddie show on KIRO, whose influence on the local theatrical and performance scenes lasted for decades. KING had morning and evening talk shows, providing endless interview slots to all the itinerant book-pluggers crisscrossing the nation. KOMO had a “religious program” called Strength for These Days, which ran at 5:45 a.m. weekdays and consisted entirely of the same film footage of ocean waves and windblown trees every day, accompanied by choir music.
Seattle radio was an even odder beast. For one thing, AM stations still dominated.
For the grownups, KVI’s dynamic eccentrics Bob Hardwick and Jack Morton engaged a spirited ratings battle against KOMO’s personable square Larry Nelson and KIRO’s fledgling news-talk format.
For the kids, KVI and KING-AM played an odd top-40 melange of anything that happened to be popular (Dolly Parton, Lynard Skynard, Helen Reddy, Barry White, Edgar Winter, Tony Orlando, Donny Osmond).
For the older kids, the FM band found KISW and KZOK blasting Led Zeppelin, AC/DC and their metal brethern out to Camaro-drivin’ teens from Spanaway to Stanwood.
The UW, meanwhile, had a little FM operation, KUOW, which played blocks of classical music (competing with the then-commercial KING-FM) and that newfangled network newscast with those really soft-talking announcers. (The U also ran a smaller operation, KCMU, as a laboratory for broadcast-communications students to play Grateful Dead songs and mumble their way through the weather report.)
And there was an honest-to-goodness radical community station, KRAB-FM. Its announcers often hemmed and hawed their way through a set list, but they played everything from Thai pop to big-band to political folk. It had talk blocks, too: Vietnamese children’s fables, classical lit, rambling speeches by already-aging hippie celebrities about why Those Kids Today had become too apathetic. KRAB stumbled through internal politics and mismanagement until 1984. Its frequency is now occupied by KNDD.)
TOMORROW: The Seattle arts scene at the time.
IN OTHER NEWS: Here’s a fun rumor for all you conspiracy theorists (which I’m not): Could OPEC countries be scheming to raise oil prices and engender U.S. voter restlessness against Gore/Lieberman? (found by Progressive Review)
NOW THAT EITHER a summer or winter Olympic Games occur every other year, the whole mega-ritual has become almost too familiar to seem really special; especially as packaged for American network TV.
The drill can be as painful as mile 24 of a marathon, and lasts much longer. Network officials invariably overpay for the rights to the games, then decide American viewers aren’t really interested in the sporting competitions.
So they end up televising only brief snippets of the various contests–just enough to set the stage for the supposed real audience grabbers, the slickly-edited personality profiles and human-interest vignettes.
During these segments, the athletes try their hardest to project enough personality to become instant celebrities (and, with luck, score big endorsement deals). But their constant training since learning to walk has turned most of them into no-fun workaholics, scarcely able to complete a coherent sentence.
And even when events are playing (taped hours before and edited in such a way as to destroy a game’s natural pacing), the announcers do everything possible to create a “feel-good” narrative storyline that’ll appeal to 18-35 female viewers who don’t normally watch sports.
That means U.S. competitors are often billed as the “stars,” whether in real contention or not.
It means events that are supposed to appeal to the target audience (gymnastics, swimming, women’s track and field) get priority time and attention, while others are left in obscurity.
It also means the technical, less-flashy elements of a sport are ignored whenever possible, in favor of highlight-reel spectacle moments.
Compare and contrast, meanwhile, to the CBC coverage, which has drawn cult followings in U.S. border towns such as Seattle and among big-dish satellite subscribers.
CBC does play a lot of attention to its country’s competitors; but since there are far fewer of them, it means the channel shows long stretches of field hockey, water polo, and many other NBC-unfavorite sports that happen to have a strong Canadian entrant.
CBC’s lower-budgeted coverage relies more heavily on the international-feed video, which emphasizes straightforward, no-nonsense coverage. To this footage, the Canadian network adds announcers who not only know the sports they’re covering, they assume their viewers care about the sports too.
And because it encourages its viewers to care about the games themselves, rather than just the instant celebrities, CBC isn’t afraid to show them live. This year, that means afternoon events in Sydney air in prime time in Toronto (late afternoon out here). Evening events in Sydney air late-night in Pacific Time, in the wee hours in the east.
NBC could’ve done this with its pair of subsidiary cable channels, but apparently couldn’t get over the “this is the way we’ve always done it” syndrome. The result: Anemic ratings and widespread disinterest; while the CBC broadcasters are becoming the games’ real heroes to those Americans capable of receiving them.
We’re probably seeing the end of the Olympic Games, as American television viewers have known them. The mass audience NBC wants can’t be corralled in by human-interest pap anymore because it doesn’t exist anymore. The next games could be covered on a broadcast channel with highlight shows (that don’t pretend to be more than highlight shows), on cable with live coverage of events with an adequate audience draw, and on the Net with unedited, multiple streaming-video feeds of everything. (Yes, even the Modern Pentathlon.)
In the post-mass-market age, nobody cares about media products packaged for people who don’t care. In sports coverage, you’ve gotta find, nurture, and build niche audiences among people who know and care about the particular sports being covered.
In the case of the Olympics, if you aggregate enough niche audiences for all the component sports, you could still have something.
TOMORROW: Web content as shareware.
LIKE THE PRE-DOT-COM SEATTLE, Canada has long been a place whose most prominent cultural identity has centered on its collective moping about whether it has a cultural identity.
And like the old Seattle stereotype, the subsidiary tenets of the Canadian stereotype are of a generic North American region with a smidgen more politeness than most, and an economy centered around the hewing of wood and the gathering of water.
Seattleites cry and wail whenever a beloved little sliver of what used to pass for “unique,” or at least locally-thought-up, culture goes away (a condo-ized old apartment building, a low-rise downtown block).
Canadians had been so apparently starved for a show of national pride that when one came along a year and a half ago or so, citizens rallied around it and even took to memorizing its lines. This unifying object of nationalistic fervor? A beer commercial.
When I visited Vancouver again last week, I set out in specific search of the Canadian (or at least a Vancouver) spirit. Something defining “Our Neighbors to the North” as more than just other than U.S. folk.
I arrived in time to see the first all-Canadian episodes of Who Wants to Be a Millionaire.
In a Mother Jones essay years ago, Canadian author Margaret Atwood claimed her first experience of unfairness came while reading the ads on the insides of Popsicle wrappers, offering cool little toys and trinkets in exchange for a few hundred wrappers–but closing with the fine-print disclaimer, “Offer Not Available In Canada.”
Similarly, a lot of the appeal of Millionaire is that any adult with a wide knowledge of useless trivia can become a contestant. You don’t have to live in L.A. and go through two or more rounds of in-person auditions.
But you do have to be a U.S. citizen.
The CTV network has aired the U.S. edition of the British-born show, to handsome ratings, despite its viewers’ ineligibility to be contestants. The show’s done so well that the normally tight-spending CTV commissioned two hour-long episodes just for itself. It hired a Canadian host (one of its own talk-show stars), recruited Canadian contestants and audience members, and devised Canadian-content questions.
But then, to save some money, it had the specials produced in New York, using the set and crew of the ABC Millionaire.
(Yes, you heard it right: A Canadian TV show shot in the U.S.! Truly an anomaly of X-Files level weirdness.)
Anyhoo, the two episodes got more viewers than any domestically-produced entertainment show in Canadian TV history, even though no contestant won more than C$64,000 (about US$44,000; still the most ever won on a Canadian game show). CTV promised that later this season, Canada will become the umpteenth nation to air its own regular Millionaire series. A triumph of fairness for all the bespectacled, bad-hair-day-prone egghead guys from Missasagua to Kamloops, but not necessarily an ingredient in the country’s endless search for a Unique Cultural Identity.
Or maybe not. According to one critic, writing on the newsgroup alt.tv.game-shows:
“I have this ugly feeling that [CTV host Pamela Wallin] or perhaps the Canadians involved feel that she needs to do different things than Regis Philbin in order to make the show distinctively Canadian. This is one of the most common (and most exasperating) traits Canadians tend to have: we follow the lead of the USA, but add some so-called Canadian spin so that we can reassure ourselves that we’re not Americans. PW went mildly anti-Regis: no jokes, no fast pace, heck, no accent! If she’d just relax and stop trying so hard to be Canadian, it’d all work better.”
Maybe “trying so hard to be Canadian” really IS Canada’s unique cultural identity. Except that it’s darn close to Seattle’s cultural identity.
TOMORROW: Other Canadian-adventure notes.
IN OHER NEWS: If there’s a place where an “English-language-only” rule is especially inappropriate, it’d be among international long-distance operators.
THE MAJOR-PARTY APOLOGISTS, especially the Democrats, are pleading with voters not to jump on any Nader bandwagon. They’re insisting there really is a difference between Gore and Bush, enough of a difference that you’ve gotta choose only one of those two–lest the nation be stuck with the other of those two.
Yet the Gore supporters’ claims of difference (which seem to involve such secondary issues as how quickly Social Security funds can be fed into the control of Wall Street speculators) continue to be contradicted by the increasingly-apparent similarities.
Both love “free” trade and the rule of global financiers. Both want to turn up the federal $ spigot to big weapons contractors. Both would keep up the dumb ol’ “war on drugs,” and pay as little lip service as possible to campaign-finance reform. Both claim today’s is the best of all possible economic worlds; even though real-world wage and earning-power equations get decreasingly rosy the further you stray from the top-20 income percentile.
And both camps have said, or at least implied, that Something Must Be Done against all the sexy, threatening, violent, or just plain icky material out there in our pop-culture landscape these days.
They’re not saying it loudly or direclty enough to threaten the media conglomerates the candidates depend upon for hype pieces (er, “news coverage”) and, in the case of Gore, for big campaign bucks.
But they are saying it. Particularly Al Gore’s pal, and Tipper Gore’s sometime aide in crusades against musical free speech, Veep candidate Joe Lieberman.
The Lieb’s basic stump speech invokes two main themes:
Lieberman and Gore have avoided, as far as I can tell, bashing NEA-supported art shows or college English classes. The Bush campaign, eager to put the GOP’s legacy of past priggishness behind it, has also been relatively muted in this regard–thus far. But the prigs still have a degree of power in the GOP trenches, and I predict it won’t be long before Bush starts trying to appeal to them.
So should we worry about these comparatively mild, but bipartisan, rants?
Yes.
If these rants become enforced public policy in the next administration, you probably won’t see direct government attempts to fully ban anything (except strip clubs).
You’re more likely to see, both within the next administration and from private groups operating under the next administration’s endorsement, targeted actions against specific “offensive” entertainments:
As usual, you needn’t fret for the big campaign-contributing media giants that have made zillions on raunch in commercial entertainment.
As we’ve seen with the conglomerates’ Napster-bashing, freedom and open expression aren’t among their highest priorities.
And as we’ve seen with the Napster phenom, such attempts to prop up the plutocracy of Big Media these days end up getting ever more desperate and blatant. They might not succeed in the long run, but can do a lot of damage in the attempt.
TOMORROW: Further adventures with the Razor scooter.
IN OTHER NEWS: Some 200 gay activists and supporters massed on Capitol Hill this past Saturday evening and Sunday morning, to counter-demonstrate against a series of antigay “rallies” by seven (count ’em!) supporters of a virulently bigoted Kansas preacher. Except at the end of the Saturday protests (when one counter-protester tried to approach one of the bigots, only to get shoved onto a car hood by the cops who were keeping the two camps apart), I’ve never seen so many loud and colorfully-dressed people get so worked up about a handful of inauspicious whitebreads since the last Presidential nominating conventions.