»
S
I
D
E
B
A
R
«
NOSTALGIA FOR WHAT NEVER WAS
May 1st, 2001 by Clark Humphrey

IN LAST SUNDAY’S Seattle Times Sunday magazine, my ol’ pal Fred Moody had a memoir piece about his 20-plus years as a freelancer, staff writer, and/or editor at Seattle Weekly. It’s a nice little read; but two aspects particularly struck me:

1. Moody appears to believe, unless he’s being really sarcastic (and he’s been known to get that way), that the original Weekly incarnation under founding publisher David Brewster was a daring, status-quo-challenging “alternative” rag.

Bull doo-doo. Claiming the Brewster-era Weekly had ever been “alternative” is as phony a boomer-generation conceit as claiming Linda Ronstadt had ever been a rock singer.

From the start, the Weekly had been an attempt to put out the content of a slick upscale city monthly on once-a-week newsprint. (Brewster had previously worked on the first Seattle magazine.) The second cover story was about a “foodie” restaurant (the now-defunct Henry’s Off Broadway). Restaurant covers outnumbered arts covers most years, as best as I can recall.

From its political priorities to its entertainment coverage, everything in it was aimed at a small but well-defined target audience–the New Professionals who wore Nordstrom dress-for-success suits to jobs at the big new downtown office towers, attended watered-down “art” movies such as Harold and Maude, and dined on “gourmet” versions of American comfort foods. (The paper’s original backers included Gordon Bowker, who also helped start Starbucks and Redhook.)

If it ever took a “non-mainstream” approach to its topics, it was the same approach as that taken by early NPR or such PBS shows as Washington Week In Review–not the elite speaking to the masses, but the elite speaking to itself.

And if it ever took anything approaching an “irreverent” attitude toward regional politics, it was only firmly placed within official worldview–that The Sixties Generation, no matter how blanded-out and comfortably ensconced in premature middle age, was the absolute ultimate apex of human evolution.

In this worldview, oldsters (including oldster politicians) constituted a squaresville presence to be placated or patronized.

And anyone too young to have needed (or too proletarian to have attained) a college deferment from Vietnam didn’t even count as a full human being.

Thus, rock n’ roll music was never, ever, a priority at the old Weekly. Nor was any black culture too young to have been taken over by whites.

If you think this is just my Blank Generation whining, it isn’t. The Weekly has been sold and totally revamped twice, but old Weekly worldview lives on in the current mayoral campaign of Mark Sidran, whose demographic-cleansing campaigns as city attorney are based squarely on the assumption that upscale white baby boomers are the only “real” people in this town.

2. Moody was right on the button when he noted that, just as the success of the early Stranger proved how old and unhip the old Weekly was (or at least as it had become), so is today’s Stranger heading in the same direction.

But that’s a topic for another day.

NEXT: People who want me to plug their sites.

ELSEWHERE:

GETTING A GRILLING
Apr 26th, 2001 by Clark Humphrey

I LIKE FAST FOOD. Wanna make something of it?

Many do. (Want to make something of it, that is.)

book cover Eric Schlosser’s new book Fast Food Nation is only the most recent example.

Schlosser’s tirade states, essentially, that all of America except for the Enlightened Few such as himself (and presumably his readers) are mindless sheep, being led to a metaphorica slaughter of obesity and cholesterol by greedy mega-corporations, callously out to rake in billions off of lethal meals at home and then to export this monolithic Americulture to the world.

At best, these arguments are misguided. At worst, they display a classist basis.

I like fast food (although I know it’s a pleasure best enjoyed, like so many other pleasures, in moderation). It’s cheap, tasty, unpretentious, and gets you back to your busy day. Feeding doesn’t have to be sit-down and from-scratch, any more than sex has to always involve a whole weekend at one of those dungeon B&Bs.

And fast food doesn’t necessarily have to be huge and corporate. Look at those tasty burger and gyros booths at street fairs, or at the feisty local drive-ins and hot-dog stands in most cities and towns.

And it sure doesn’t have to be a symbol of American cultural imperialism. Look at the feisty taco wagons of White Center and South Park, or the teriyaki and bento stands that are a modern fixture of most Northwest urban neighborhoods.

Fast food, or something like it, exists in nearly every society big enough to have urban dwellers on the go. (Although many of U.S. ethnic-restaurant favorites were actually invented here, by clever immigrant chefs.)

So get off your exclusionary-tribalist purity trip and have a fry. Or a spicy chicken bowl. Or a falafel-on-a-stick. Or some flying morning glory on fire.

IN OTHER NEWS: Had the privilege of meeting Floyd Schmoe, patriarch of the Seattle Quaker church and longtime peace activist, in 1991, around the time he started the Seattle Peace Park across from the Quaker center in the U District. He was in his mid-90s then, still alert and still a devout activist for pacifism. If I live as long as he (passing this week at age 105), I can only hope to have achieved half the good works he did.

NEXT: Images full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

ELSEWHERE:

OUTSIDE KOZMO-POLIS
Apr 23rd, 2001 by Clark Humphrey

HERE’S MY TAKE on why Net-based delivery outfits have collapsed (Kozmo.com, Pets.com), merged away (HomeGrocer.com), or are on the verge of demise (Webvan.com).

It’s not just that these enterprises had to Get Big Fast by building real-world inventories, infrastructures, and staffs on what used to be known as “Internet Time.”

They were also based on a faulty premise from the start.

These concepts were devised by tech-biz moguls and wannabe tech-biz moguls who lived in Frisco, Manhattan, and horse country, and who imagined that all of urban America had the lifestyles of tech-biz moguls who lived in Frisco, Manhattan, and horse country.

I.e., they presumed the existence of tens of millions of folk with lotsa disposable income, little or no disposable time, and either no individual vehicle or no major supermarkets or strip malls nearby.

But as it turned out, the suburban lifestyle has yet to take a serious popularity hit. Most middle- and upper-caste Americans have never needed to get their dog food or cat litter delivered UPS Ground, or for their Frosted Flakes to arrive via private courier.

And those who did need or at least enjoy the service didn’t like it enough to pay the extra costs neded to make it all viable. (Part of the genius of/trouble with superstore/strip-mall marketing is the amount of “hidden” distribution costs passed on to consumers by making them drive to ever-larger, ever-further-apart emporia.)

I was an occasional Kozmo.com customer, and still am an Albertsons.com customer. Delivery isn’t just a convenience to me; it’s a vital building block of the New Urbanism. We need to promote more car-free living (not just commuting).

But the way to build such alternatives isn’t with centralized, top-down, venture-capital-funded, high-profile, high-burn-rate Big Ideas. It’s with street-level, little-guy entrepreneurial efforts, rooted in their localities and in touch with customers’ needs.

There’s already a small company in town that handles deliveries for local restaurants. As part of its schtick, it also offers a small selection of convenience-store items. I can’t see why the same can’t be done for video rentals, staple groceries, etc., without the dot-com hype and with old-fashioned service.

NEXT: Turn On TV Week.

IN OTHER NEWS: I’ve continued to delay the transformation of this site’s main page to the increasingly popular “welbog” format. Still haven’t figured out how to replicate all the page’s features in one of those scripted weblog programs.

ELSEWHERE:

  • You know those weird new corporate names out there? Turns out there are companies that do nothing but make up those names!…
  • Confused by our language’s weird spelling rules and exceptions? One guy recommends: Don’t worry about it….
PEOPLE YOU'RE NOT BETTER THAN
Jan 12th, 2001 by Clark Humphrey

A LITTLE OVER A MONTH AGO, this virtual space contained a listing of certain groups of people who might consider themselves to be intrinsically superior to you, but who are not. (Go ahead and read it now if you haven’t; we’ll wait for you.)

This, in contrast, is a listing of groups of people you might consider yourself to be intrinsically superior to, but which you are not.

Here, therefore and with no further ado, are People You’re Not Better Than:

  • TV viewers.
  • Residents of small towns who didn’t move there from a bigger city.
  • Adherents of religions other than yours.
  • Members of races other than yours.
  • Members of genders other than yours.
  • People who shop at Wal-Mart.
  • People who shop at non-coop grocery stores.
  • People who listen to radio stations not affiliated with NPR.
  • People who listen to ocuntry music (and not just that hipster-acceptable “alt.country” either).
  • Fans of major sports teams.
  • People who shop at thrift stores out of necessity, not fashion.
  • Reader’s Digest subscribers.
  • People without college degrees.
  • People with college degrees in purely vocational fields.
  • People who don’t have their own websites.
  • People who don’t have home computers.
  • People who don’t have homes.
  • People whose drugs of choice (including non-chemical highs) are different from yours.
  • Non-users.
  • Julia Roberts fans.
  • Carnivores.
  • Clients of traditional western medicine.
  • Non-car owners.
  • Domestic-car owners.
  • People who lived in White Center prior to 1998.
  • People who live in the midwest or the south.
  • People who wear polyester non-ironically.
  • People who go, or have gone, to public schools.
  • Romance novel readers.
  • People younger than you.
  • Athletes, brainiacs, and goody-two-shoeses.
  • Cheerleaders, beauty queens, and models.
  • Other females who have more sexual partners than you, or who simply look or act “cheap.”
  • Other males who look or act less “macho” than you.
  • Heterosexuals.
  • That co-worker who seems to actually enjoy that shit job you share.
  • Grunt-level employees of the farming, timber, manufacturing, transportation, and food-service industries.
  • Men with pot bellies.
  • Women with implants.
  • Fast- and processed-food eaters.
  • Bud Light drinkers.
  • People who look, act, or talk too weird.
  • People who look, act, or talk too “normal.”

MONDAY: Imagining, in a little more detail, a successor paper to the Seattle Union Record.

ELSEWHERE:

  • Proof that the Web brings back everything great from pop-cult history–a tribute to the greatest achievement of post-1950 radio, Monitor! (Think of it as NPR without the Volvo-snob attitude problem)….
  • Free the haggis smugglers!…
THINGS GONE AND GOING, PART 2
Jan 11th, 2001 by Clark Humphrey

YESTERDAY AND TODAY, some recent departures from the pop-cult scene, locally and nationally.

THINGS THAT HAVE GONE AWAY #5: Our Love and War Man already misses Mike Mailway (real name Larry M. Boyd), whose locally-based syndie trivia column ended a week and a half ago. Always wished I could write like him. That staccato, crime-movie-soundtrack rhythm. The eternally provocative mix of historic, scientific, and just odd facts gathered from all times and places. Had the privilege of meeting him a few times; always the perfect gent. I wish him well.

THINGS THAT ARE GOING AWAY #1: What with all the sanctimonious gnashing-O-teeth that’s gone on over the threatening might of big-box chain bookstores, you might not expect any tears for the demise of such an outlet. But loyal customers are indeed huing and ado-ing over the impending loss of Tower Books on lower Queen Anne. Cause of death: The usual (mercenary rent hike).

The store’s annual 30-percent-off pre-inventory sale is being extended until closing day, Feb. 4. It’ll be missed, partly because Tower’s one chain that acted sorta like an indie in its niche-marketing prowess. Because most of its other outlets were attached to Tower Records stores, it was big on the sorts of books CD buyers like. Glossy pop-star tomes, yes; but also coffee-table art and photography, sci-fi, erotica, student reference, self-help, astrology, comix, lefty-politics, Beat-generation nostalgia, and literary-hipster fiction. (Although the approach had its drawbacks, such as when they had to put the Bukowski novels behind the counter to prevent theft by suburban down-and-outer wannabes.)

Tower says it wants to eventually build a book annex on the site of its current record store six blocks away, but has given no timetable for the project.

THINGS THAT ARE GOING AWAY #2: Puget Consumers Co-op is closing its oldest alterna-food and vitamin store, in Ravenna. Way back in the early ’80s, when PCC really was a cooperatively-run small merchant, Ravenna was its only space (it had previously been an even smaller food-buying club). It was a subculture, a ‘tribe’ if you wish.

As you may know, I’m something of a skeptic about many of today’s neo-Puritanical food religions (macrobiotic, organic, vegan, ‘live,’ etc.). But I had, and have, every respect for the healthful values of community, of being part of a circle of humans who care about one another. That’s something PCC gradually lost as it became a professionally-managed chain store.

THINGS THAT ARE GOING AWAY #3: The Seattle Times Co., citing a need to cut costs due to recent circumstances (see below), is shutting Mirror, its eight-year-old monthly tabloid for teenagers.

I was a part-time assistant on Mirror’s first five issues. The yup-ladies who ran it had believed those mainstream-media scare stories that Those Kids Today were all a bunch of illiterate louts; so the yup-ladies thought they’d need an adult to write the paper. But the editors soon realized that many public high school students really can read and write (they just choose not to read the Seattle Times); so my services proved unneeded.

THINGS THAT ARE GOING AWAY #4: With the end of the Seattle newspaper strike comes the end of the strike paper, the Seattle Union Record.

As I’ve said previously, it was about two-thirds of the way toward becoming the real opposition daily this town needs. While the Newspaper Guild won’t be publishing the Union Record anymore (or drumming up other unions for sympathy ads), many of the Seattle Times strikers won’t be returning to their old jobs, and hence might be available to continue their Record work under new management. I’d love to be a part of making such a paper happen.

Let’s all talk about this again real soon.

TOMORROW: People you’re not better than.

ELSEWHERE:

THINGS I LIKE 2000
Nov 24th, 2000 by Clark Humphrey

IT’S BEEN A WHILE since I did an all-list column, but this and the next will be such.

Today, in a post-Thanksgiving gesture of sorts, are as many Things I Like as I can think of right now (just to placate those readers who falsely complain that I never seem to like anything), in no particular order:

  • Snow. Hope we get some in Seattle this winter.
  • Discovering a great new band.
  • Luxuria Music, a streaming net-radio station playing a mix of lounge, jazz, surf, bebop, soundtracks, and other “music to stimulate the entire organism.” It’s co-curated by The Millionaire, formerly co-leader of cocktail nation faves Combustible Edison.
  • Brave New Waves, a nightly program of experimental and just plain odd music from the CBC (and streamed online at 9 p.m. PT).
  • The inventive products of North America’s packaged-food and fast-food industries.
  • Sex. (Well, duh….) Specifically, the kind of sex that brings two people closer together on psychic-emotional-physical levels.

    (Though there’s also much to be said for daydreamt fantasies involving Adrienne Shelly in a private railroad car with piped-in Bollywood movie music and a few cases of Reddi-Wip.)

  • Harper’s Magazine.
  • Collecting old magazines, especially the kinds that aren’t normally collected (Time, Seventeen, Family Circle).
  • Pre-1970 nudist books and magazines. Hard to tell which aspect of these images is more worldview-skewing: The sight of pre-hippie-era grownups (of all ages, genders, and physiques) unabashedly nude, the sight of unabashedly nude grownups in deliberatley non-erotic (sometimes even anti-erotic) poses, or the accompanying text sermons defending the lifestyle as being just as clean, wholesome, and sexually repressed as any deserving aspect of mainstream American life.

    (The new “Imagined Landscapes” show at Consolidated Works includes a group of three hyperrealistic paintings by NY artist Peter Drake based on ’50s nudist-mag images, only with suburban front yards for backgrounds instead of open picnic grounds.)

  • The new Office Depot at 4th and Pike.
  • Unexpected phone calls from people I personally know who aren’t trying to sell me something.
  • The recent election mess. No, really. It was one of those fun interruptions of the daily grind, and it kept going into ever-further absurdity levels like an Absolutely Fabulous script.
  • Glow-in-the-dark green plastic. You can get it in everything from yo-yos to toothbrushes to Burger King promo toys. Heck, you can even get an Apple iBook in it!
  • Grocery deliveries.
  • Online reference libraries.
  • Pyramid Snow Cap Ale.
  • Digital video camcorders. The devices which just might yet kill Hollywood. (You’re getting me one for Christmas, right?)
  • The recent Pac-10 football season, which came down to the last weekend with three (count ’em!) of the conference’s four Northwest teams battling it out for the championship–including the long-humbled, now-proud Oregon State Beavers!
  • The conveniences of modern life; including but not limited to indoor plumbing, electricity, telephone service, public transportation, trash pickup, a division-of-labor setup wherein many of us don’t have to toil out in the fields tending crops unless we want to, digital cable, photocopiers, and electronic bill paying.
  • Truly wacky ’70s movies, such as Lisa and the Devil or Dolemite.
  • Money. Just love the stuff. Wish I had some now.

(If this amused you, there’s also a separate Things I Like page on this site, which duplicates almost none of the items on this list.)

MONDAY: Another list, this one of people who aren’t really better than you.

IN OTHER NEWS: Thursday saw a skinny scab-edition P-I but no Times, at least not in the downtown, Capitol Hill, and North End neighborhoods of my holiday travels. Today will likely see no Friday entertainment sections; causing movie-time-seeking readers to grab for weekly or suburban papers. What will the Sunday Times look like, aside from preprinted feature sections? We’ll find out.

ELSEWHERE:

HAUNTED GROUND, PART 1
Oct 31st, 2000 by Clark Humphrey

Haunted Ground

by Guest Columnist Donna Barr

ASK ANYONE–the students and off-duty sailors and shipyard workers that hang out at the local coffee bars. Even the guy at the once-a-month Gay Bingo, that is held along with a spaghetti supper in the basement of the Episcopalian Church, the guy that just moved up from San Francisco.

They’ll all tell you Bremerton is the most surreal town they’ve ever known.

Bremerton isn’t really a consolidated town; it’s made up of different populations, the students at Olympic College, the floating drug-dealers barking like seals downtown, the poor down west and the not-so-poor up east.

In Bremerton “West” is actually south of the bridges, “East” actually north. Callow used to be a village on its own, like Manette, before they were both assimilated by Bremerton. Now one is a street, the other a neighborhood.

There aren’t any ethnic neighborhoods in this town; everybody is all mixed in together. At a block-watch party, you’re likely to be served chicken adobo, Cajun barbeque chicken, and chicken-and-rice soup. If there’s been a sale on chicken down at the Callow Safeway, there will probably be lemon chicken and chicken-foot soup.

On Callow is the world’s smallest native-people’s reservation. It takes up about of a city block, standing out among the surrounding houses by tall second-growth Douglas firs. It’s been reserved because it’s a graveyard.

The graves are marked by low stones, that lie between the trailers of the mobile-home park. The locals have always lived with their dead. There were a lot of locals here at one time, and they left a lot of dead, but this is all that’s left of their graves. The rest have been gouged up and paved over. You’re better off if you’re psychicly deaf; at night this town walks like Edinburgh.

On the Bremerton map, a very faint cross was used to mark the reservation; you’ll have to look hard to see it. Now it’s marked by a very faint bow-and-arrow. Some kind of politics went on, but I don’t know what.

The city graveyard on the south side has graves in it from the 1800s. Some of the people in it fought in the Civil War–there’s a little walled plot for them. The graveyard dog is a big black dumb Labrador named Brutus. If you call him The Graveyard Dog, you have to make sure you mean the LIVE one–otherwise, people get spooked.

When we came home from a funeral, we found the big fool locked up in our back yard, looking all confused and stupid. He wore a tag, so we called his owner, who came to get him, and had a hard time driving away with a big happy cloud of Brutus jumping all over the front seat with him.

If you walk in the city graveyard in the southeast corner in full daylight, you may catch a glimpse of a tall heavy man wearing a black suit and a white waistcoat out of the corner of your eye. If you turn and look at him, he’s not there. The old guys in town say that if you go down to the shipyard late at night and watch the mothballed ships, the old dead air-craft carriers and destroyers, you’ll see the crews lined up, faintly, in the moonlight.

The politics in Bremerton are pretty surreal, too. Water’s cheap, sewer’s expensive–Bremerton is paying for Gorst’s rebuilt sewer system.

The downtown is gutted, because everybody who’s holding the old, asbestos-laden houses won’t sell until they get full market prices, so no projects to improve the waterfront or the downtown can go forward. The businesses went to Silverdale, where the malls were built in the middle of an important salmon watershed–and get flooded out every time there’s a heavy rain.

Ha ha ha.

The boys catch bullheads in the bay and make “meat-puppets” out of them, partially gutting them with pocket-knives or nail-scissors, so they don’t die too quickly, then sticking their fingers through the torn bellies and making them “talk.” Or they catch the fish on lines, then whip them to death on the surface, laughing their heads off.

TOMORROW: Some more of this.

ELSEWHERE:

  • Let’s get this straight: The “Century of Song” site chooses one pop song from every year of the 20th century, then records and posts its own version of it….
THE SPIRIT OF '75
Oct 3rd, 2000 by Clark Humphrey

LAST FRIDAY AND YESTERDAY, I began a recollection of Seattle during the fall of 1975.

Today we continue by examining the arts scene in those pre-Bicentennial months; a scene newly flush with public funding and a lively, participatory spirit.

A thriving theater/performance-art milieu was neatly divided into two casts, with only a few performers crossing over between the two. You had the Rep and ACT (and the new Intiman) mounting “real” dramas (usually stuffed with NYC actors) for well-dressed audiences and major donors.

Then you had the funkier, smaller troupes. Some of these outfits in the 1974-84-or-so period included the Bathhouse, the Skid Road Show, Ze Whiz Kidz, the Pioneer Square Theater, the Conservatory Theater Co., and the Group. One company from this scene, the Empty Space, survives today. Another, the One Reel Vaudeville Show, morphed into a thriving events-production company.

These troupes shared a broadly defined aesthetic, influenced by varying degrees of late-hippie boistrousness, gay-camp outrageousness, avant-theater experimentation, National Lampoon-esque irreverence, post-collegiate volunteer enthusiasm, and conceptual-art pretensions. They created energetic and spunky (if inconsistent) shows, to a core audience that was willing to sit out the lesser efforts in hopes of catching something unexpectedly smashing.

And it worked, as long as the core audience stayed loyal and as long as scraps of arts funding helped subsidize the affordable ticket prices. But as the Reagan era dragged on, the arts funding (at least to non-“major” producing organizations) dried up, the corporate donors stayed loyal to the big theaters, the expenses (especially rents) crept up, the old audiences started staying home nights, and many of the performers and directors drifted off to NYC or to real careers. The spirit of these old theaters lives on in today’s Theater Schmeater, Annex, and Union Garage.

Visual arts here were looking for a new way. The “Northwest School” painters had died, retired, or moved away. The Seattle Art Museum was still in its old Volunteer Park mini-palace and paid little attention to living local artists. The Center on Contemporary Art was still five years away.

For traditional-style painters and sculptors (and for those newfangled glass-art craftspeople), there were the Pioneer Square galleries, which were just getting started. For artists with bigger ambitions (or the right connections), a One Percent For Art program funnelled a piece of every local government construction project into big, vaguely modernistic, but preferably non-controversial works. (Though many of the biggest One Percent commissions went to California big names, or to cronies of the art bureaucrats awarding them.)

The music scene was in a creative slump. Everything on the club circuit was segregated into formulaic genres. There were all-white blues bands in Pioneer Square, top-40 cover bands (including White Heart, which became Heart) in the meatmarket clubs, soft-rock balladeers in the U District, and, in a couple of dance clubs, this new thing called disco. It was, then, a celebratory, participatory scene in which no costume was too outlandish, no dance move too flamboyant. It was gay lib meeting black power meeting repressed suburban kids’ dreams of glamour and thrills. And, on a good night, it was a lot more fun and freewheeling than its stuck-up grandson, techno, can even hope to be.

TOMORROW: Struggling with the post-Vietnam economy.

ELSEWHERE:

  • Those damned dot-commers–the long hours, the grating egos, the incessant hype over ventures that’ll never make it. Are they on drugs or something? Often, yes. (found by Media News)….
  • Now that the fall TV season is finally upon us, a fake preview piece funnier than most of the “comedy” shows are bound to be….
  • New uses for mac n’ cheese (and other classic North American convenience foods)! Just read the recipes on The Back of the Box….
THAT '70S COLUMN
Sep 29th, 2000 by Clark Humphrey

‘TWAS A QUARTER-CENTURY AGO THIS MONTH that yr. humble reporter first settled in the Jet City, embarking upon adulthood after a forgettable adolescence in smaller places.

With all the hype these days about ’70s nostalgia (or was that already over by 1998?) and all the talk these days about the monstrously “World Class” burg Seattle’s become, it’s a good time to look back upon the Seattle of 1975.

Even then, the municipal cliches and cliques still plaguing us now were in force. There were the business boosters out to make us a Big League City (the Kingdome was under construction on the site of a disused railroad yard).

There were the grumblers who blamed Californian newcomers for ruining everything, who bitched at the “provincial” ways of the folk already here, or both. There were other grumblers who said Seattle was too much like Los Angeles, not enough like San Francisco, or both.

There were the folks still in their late ’20s who seemed to feel that their real lives had already ended with the end of “The Sixties,” and who saw the verdant Northwest as a place to live out their remaining years in smug contentment. There were young proto-punks who craved passion and excitement, and who naturally loathed their elders who demanded an entire city devoted to peace and quiet.

Downtown Seattle’s transformation had begun seven years before with the Seafirst Tower (now the 1000 4th Avenue Tower), and was well underway by ’75. Freeway Park and the first phase of the Convention Center had been built. But thre were still plenty of blocks of two- to six-story brick and terra-cotta buildings. The most stately of these, the White-Henry-Stuart building, was being demolished for the tapered-bottomed Rainier Bank Tower (now Rainier Squre).

Nordstrom had expanded from a shoe store into a half-block collection of boutiques, and had instituted its infamous sales-force-as-religious-cult motivational system (later imitated at Microsoft and Amazon.com). Frederick & Nelson was still the grand dame of local dept. stores; J.C. Penney still had its biggest-in-the-company store where the Newmark tower is now.

Also still downtown: Florsheim, Woolworth, the old Westlake Bartell Drugs (with a soda fountain), and a host of locally-owned little restaurants, some with dark little cocktail lounges in the back.

The “Foodie” revolution in the restaurant biz had begun, and Seattle was one of its strongest outposts. Because the Washington Liquor Board demanded that all cocktail lounges have a restaurant in front, and that those restaurant-lounges earn at least 40 percent of their revenue from food sales, operators were constantly scrambling for the latest foodie fad–French, fusion, Thai, penne pollo, nouvelle cuisine, pan-Asian, sushi, organic, and that “traditional Northwest cuisine” that was just being invented at the time (mostly by Californian chefs).

And in the U District, a little alleyway-entranced outfit called Cafe Allegro had just begun serving up espresso drinks to all-nighter exam-crammers; while Starbucks’ handful of coffee-bean stores had already been promoting European-style coffee to Caucasian office warriors. One of Starbucks’ founders, Gordon Bowker, would later help start Seattle Weekly and Redhook Ale.

There was no Weekly yet; but there was a small weekly opinion journal for movers-and-shakers called the Argus, which had just been sold by Olympic Stain mogul Philip Bailey to the Queen Anne News chain of neighborhood papers. There was also the Seattle Sun, a struggling little alterna-weekly which ran, between neighborhood-vs.-developer articles and reviews of the latest Bonnie Raitt LP, some of Lynda Barry’s first cartoons.

MONDAY: A little more of this; including the old sleaze district, the daily papers, the TV, the economy, entertainment, the arts, and politics.

IN OTHER NEWS: Some local Green Party candidates don’t get to share the stage at the big Ralph Nader rallies.

ELSEWHERE:

I AM (NOT) CANADIAN
Sep 21st, 2000 by Clark Humphrey

LIKE THE PRE-DOT-COM SEATTLE, Canada has long been a place whose most prominent cultural identity has centered on its collective moping about whether it has a cultural identity.

And like the old Seattle stereotype, the subsidiary tenets of the Canadian stereotype are of a generic North American region with a smidgen more politeness than most, and an economy centered around the hewing of wood and the gathering of water.

Seattleites cry and wail whenever a beloved little sliver of what used to pass for “unique,” or at least locally-thought-up, culture goes away (a condo-ized old apartment building, a low-rise downtown block).

Canadians had been so apparently starved for a show of national pride that when one came along a year and a half ago or so, citizens rallied around it and even took to memorizing its lines. This unifying object of nationalistic fervor? A beer commercial.

When I visited Vancouver again last week, I set out in specific search of the Canadian (or at least a Vancouver) spirit. Something defining “Our Neighbors to the North” as more than just other than U.S. folk.

I arrived in time to see the first all-Canadian episodes of Who Wants to Be a Millionaire.

In a Mother Jones essay years ago, Canadian author Margaret Atwood claimed her first experience of unfairness came while reading the ads on the insides of Popsicle wrappers, offering cool little toys and trinkets in exchange for a few hundred wrappers–but closing with the fine-print disclaimer, “Offer Not Available In Canada.”

Similarly, a lot of the appeal of Millionaire is that any adult with a wide knowledge of useless trivia can become a contestant. You don’t have to live in L.A. and go through two or more rounds of in-person auditions.

But you do have to be a U.S. citizen.

The CTV network has aired the U.S. edition of the British-born show, to handsome ratings, despite its viewers’ ineligibility to be contestants. The show’s done so well that the normally tight-spending CTV commissioned two hour-long episodes just for itself. It hired a Canadian host (one of its own talk-show stars), recruited Canadian contestants and audience members, and devised Canadian-content questions.

But then, to save some money, it had the specials produced in New York, using the set and crew of the ABC Millionaire.

(Yes, you heard it right: A Canadian TV show shot in the U.S.! Truly an anomaly of X-Files level weirdness.)

Anyhoo, the two episodes got more viewers than any domestically-produced entertainment show in Canadian TV history, even though no contestant won more than C$64,000 (about US$44,000; still the most ever won on a Canadian game show). CTV promised that later this season, Canada will become the umpteenth nation to air its own regular Millionaire series. A triumph of fairness for all the bespectacled, bad-hair-day-prone egghead guys from Missasagua to Kamloops, but not necessarily an ingredient in the country’s endless search for a Unique Cultural Identity.

Or maybe not. According to one critic, writing on the newsgroup alt.tv.game-shows:

“I have this ugly feeling that [CTV host Pamela Wallin] or perhaps the Canadians involved feel that she needs to do different things than Regis Philbin in order to make the show distinctively Canadian. This is one of the most common (and most exasperating) traits Canadians tend to have: we follow the lead of the USA, but add some so-called Canadian spin so that we can reassure ourselves that we’re not Americans. PW went mildly anti-Regis: no jokes, no fast pace, heck, no accent! If she’d just relax and stop trying so hard to be Canadian, it’d all work better.”

Maybe “trying so hard to be Canadian” really IS Canada’s unique cultural identity. Except that it’s darn close to Seattle’s cultural identity.

TOMORROW: Other Canadian-adventure notes.

IN OHER NEWS: If there’s a place where an “English-language-only” rule is especially inappropriate, it’d be among international long-distance operators.

ELSEWHERE:

SHOOTING THE BUMBER
Sep 6th, 2000 by Clark Humphrey

IT’S QUITE EASY to bash the Bumbershoot arts festival these days.

There’s the admission ($16 per person per day, if you don’t get advance tix, which are only available at Starbucks, that nonsupporter of alternative voices).

There’s all the corporate logos and sponsorships (radio stations “presenting” musical artists they’ll never play on the air in a million years; the auditoria labeled in all official and unofficial schedules with company names they never hold the other 51.5 weeks a year; and everywhere dot-coms, dot-coms, dot-coms).

There’s the big lines at the food booths where you get to pay $4-$7 for hastily mass-prepared fast food entrees.

There’s the annual whining by the promoters that even with all this revenue, the thing still barely breaks even, because of all the money they spend for big-name stars to attract mass audiences and all the logistics needed to handle these same mass audiences.

There’s those mass audiences themselves (who’s more troublesome: the fundamentalist Christians or the fundamentalist vegans?) and the complications they create (the lines, the difficulty in getting between venues on the Seattle Center grounds, the lines, the lack of seats or sitting room, the lines).

There’s the annoying rules (I missed all but the last 15 minutes of Big Star’s gig because I couldn’t bring my Razor scooter into KeyArena and had noplace to put it).

Then there’s the whole underlying implicit demand that You Better Start Having Fun NOW, Mister.

But there’s still a lot to like about the festival, Seattle’s annual big unofficial-end-of-summer party.

Principally: It’s a big Vegas-style lunch buffet of art. Those high admission prices give you all the culture you can eat. You can sample some “controversial” nude paintings, a slam poet or two, a couple of comedians, some of that electronic DJ music the kids are into these days, an ethnic folk ensemble or two, an hour of short art-films, and (particularly prevalent this year) late-’80s and early-’90s rock singers rechristened in “unplugged” form.

(Indeed, this year’s lineup included a whole lot of acts aimed squarely at aging college-radio listeners such as myself–the aforementioned Big Star, Tracy Chapman, Ani DiFranco, Modest Mouse, Sleater-Kinney, Ben Harper, Pete Krebs, the Posies, Quasi, Kristen Hirsch, etc. etc.

For its first two decades, Bumbershoot was programmed clearly for relics from the ’60s. Now, despite promoters’ claims to be after a youth market, it’s programmed clearly for relics from the ’80s and ’90s. Mind you, I’m not personally complaining about this at all. I like all these above-listed acts quite a bit.)

Some genres don’t work in the buffet-table concept. Classical music’s pretty much been written out of the festival in recent years; as have feature-length films, full-length plays, ballet, cabaret acts, and panel discussions. Performance art, modern dance, literary readings, and avant-improv music are still around, but in reduced quantities as organizers try to stuff as many crowd-pleasers onto the bill as they can afford.

Other genres have been shied away from, especially in the festival’s past, for skewing too young or too nonwhite. (I’m currently at home listening to the streaming webcast of DJ Donald Glaude mixing it up on the festival’s closing night; not many years ago, Bumbershoot would never have booked an African-American male whose act wasn’t aimed at making Big Chill Caucasians feel good about themselves.)

But all in all, the concept works. It’s a great big populist spectacle, a four-day long Ed Sullivan Show, a vaudeville spread out over 74 acres.

There are, of course, things I’d do with it. I’d try to figure a way to charge less money, even if that means booking fewer touring musical stars. I’d try to figure a re-entrance for classical, and bring back the “Wild Stage” program of the more offbeat performance stuff.

But, largely, Bumbershoot has turned 30 by actually gaining vitality, getting younger.

(Or maybe it’s really been 30 all along; changing fashions to keep up with its intended age like Betty and Veronica.)

(P.S.: The Bumbershoot organizers booked Never Mind Nirvana novelist Mark Lindquist at the same time and 500 feet away from the rock band whose singer’s real-life legal troubles are believed to have been roman a clef-ed for Lindquist’s story. But an attendee at the festival insisted to me that, despite what I’d written about the novel, Lindquist insisted he’d thought up his plot over a year before the real-life legal case, which occurred while he was trying to sell his manuscript to a publisher.)

TOMORROW: Riding the Mariners’ playoff roller coaster.

ELSEWHERE:

MEMORIES OF REAGAN-BASHING
Aug 29th, 2000 by Clark Humphrey

LAST FRIDAY AND YESTERDAY, we discussed the growing ’80s nostalgia fetishism.

Today, we continue an itemized explanation of how ’80s nostalgia differs from the real time:

  • Onlne Communication: Before there was the WWW, there was the BBS (Bulletin Board System) and Usenet, and also the early all-text version of CompuServe. I still run into folks from those days who miss the cameraderie of the old nerd underground (though I recall many, many insult trades and “flame wars”).

    By the latter part of the decade there were the centrally-controlled Prodigy and AOL, with their sloooow graphics and censored chatrooms.

  • Economics: The rich got ever-richer; the poor got ever-poorer; young people faced an apparent permanent shortage of real opportunities.

    Now, there are at least enough jobs to go around for college graduates (i.e., those who could still get into college after the ’80s decimation of student aid), for nice suburban scions who haven’t gotten stuck into manufacturing or farm labor.

  • Politics (conservative): Despite the poster image popular at the time with both his fans and his haters, Ronald Reagan was not Rambo. He was a doddering yet personable script reader, a front man for the financiers and weapons contractors who really ran things (and still do).
  • Politics (liberal): The last whiffs of the New Deal coalition, in which labor unions and teachers and “mainstream” environmentalists toned down any serious demands in exchange for “a place at the table.” By ’89, Clinton, Lieberman, and Co. made sure corporate power would rule the Democratic Party feast from then on.
  • Politics (radical): The Reagan/Thatcher crowd was in seemingly firm control, propping up every genocidal despot who used anticommunism as his excuse. No viable alternative appeared on the horizon. That made it easy to get into apparently unviable alternatives.

    All you had to do to proclaim your radicalness was to distribute posters of U.S. politicians with Hitler moustaches. You didn’t have to organize any coalitions, propose any agendas beyond protesting, or reach out to any constituency beyond your own drinking buddies.

    Indeed, you could boast that you were “too political” to get involved in anything as morally impure as politics.

    Eighties radicalism wasn’t about getting anything done. It was just about proving your own superiority over all those know-nothing squares out there in the Real America. Today’s way-new left appears to be getting beyond this tired nonsense, thankfully.

  • The ‘Alternative’ Scene: We really did think there was just one (1) “mainstream culture” and just one (1) “alternative” to that culture. This way-oversimplified dualism conveniently allowed many white, middle-class suburban kids to believe themselves part of, if not the entirety of, “The Other.”

    It also helped forge a vague unity-of-purpose among a vast assortment of subcultures, from drag queens and performance artists to sex-yoga teachers and health-food elitists. With the years, many of these groups drifted apart from one another, or just plain drifted apart.

In fact, there’s a lot I miss about the ’80s Seattle I hated then. The money-mania was not quite so pronounced; there were more low-rent spaces; there seemed to be more non-life-controlling jobs around; downtown stil had Penney’s and didn’t have penne.

But do I want the ’80s back? Hell no! I’d rather be forced to listen to nonstop Linda Ronstadt ballads for eternity (which, circa 1982, was what I was doing in office-drone jobs).

TOMORROW: Nostalgia for the Bell System.

ELSEWHERE:

IT'S WET. IT'S WIRED. IT'S WOW.
Aug 23rd, 2000 by Clark Humphrey

NOW LET US PRAISE the greatest Northwest pop-cult book ever written (other than Loser, of course.)

I speak of Wet and Wired: A Pop Culture Encyclopedia of the Pacific Northwest, by Randy Hodgins and Steve McLellan.

book cover The two Olympians have previously written a history of Seattle-set movies, published a short-lived print and web zine called True Northwest, and produced a comedy radio show. This modestly-produced, large-size trade paperback is their masterwork.

Its 226 pages cover over 500 of the most famous and/or influential people, places, and things in the Seattle, Portland, and Vancouver metro areas (plus a few side trips to Tacoma and Spokane). Mixing and matching the region’s three big cities means even the best expert about any one town won’t already know everything in the book (though I, natch, was familiar with at least most of the topics).

In short, easily digestible tidbits of prose (curiously laid out at odd angles), you get–

  • Artistic and literary figures (Lynda Barry, Jacob Lawrence, cartoonist John Callahan, essayist Stewart Holbrook, whodunit-ist J.A. Jance).
  • Business and political leaders (the Nordstroms, software moguls, progressive populists, big-business Democrats, Wobblies, and John (Reds) Reed).
  • Food and drink favorites (Rainier and Oly beers, the Galloping and Frugal Gourmets, Dick’s Drive-Ins, Fisher Scones).
  • Media (J.P. Patches, Wunda Wunda, some of the CBC’s blandest Vancouver-based dramas, The X-Files, Northern Exposure, Keith Jackson, Ahmad Rashad).
  • Music (The old Seattle jazz underground, the Wailers/Sonics garage bands, and a certain latter-day music explosion or three).
  • Attractions, Places, and Events (the 24-Hour Church of Elvis, the Java Jive, the Kalakala, Ivan the gorilla, Ramtha).
  • Sports and Recreation (all the big pro and college teams, a few long-gone outfits like our North American Soccer League teams, legendary (Rosalynn Sumners) and infamous (Tonya Harding) stars).

…and lots, lots more.

The book’s only sins, aside from a handful of misspelled names, are those of omission:

  • You get Nordstrom and the late Frederick & Nelson, but not the Bon Marche.
  • You get Ivar’s and Brown & Haley (“Makes ‘Em Daily”), but not the great roadside attraction that was Tiny’s Fruit Stand in Cashmere, WA.
  • You get Vancouver music greats DOA and 54-40, but not Skinny Puppy or even k.d. lang. (Its Seattle music listings are equally uncomprehensive, but there are other places you can go to read about that.)
  • Portland comic-book publisher Dark Horse gets a listing, but Seattle’s Fantagraphics Books (and the locally-based portion of its stable of artists) isn’t.

But these are relatively minor quibbles that can (and, I hope, will) be rectified in a second edition. What Wet and Wired does have is well-written, accurate (as far as I’m able to tell), and a great mosaic of glimpes into our rather peculiar section of the planet.

TOMORROW: Cirque du Soleil pitches its tent in Renton’s Lazy B country.

HEADLINE OF THE WEEK (Tacoma News Tribune, 8/21): “Giant Salmon a Scary Prospect.” I can see the horror movie ad campaigns now….

IN OTHER NEWS: Sometimes justice does occur!

ELSEWHERE:

BYE BYE BELLTOWN
Jul 24th, 2000 by Clark Humphrey

LAST FRIDAY, I began to discuss my recent move from a Belltown apartment to a Pike-Pine Corridor condo.

I’d first moved into the Ellis Court building in September 1991. As you may recall, several other things happened in Seattle that month. Nirvana released Nevermind, Pearl Jam released Ten, KNDD brought commercial “alternative” radio back to Seattle airwaves for the first time in three years, and a certain tabloid newspaper, for which I would end up devoting seven years of my life, began publication.

When I first moved in, Ellis Court was a regular commercial apartment building. I hadn’t known that it had been a favorite of drug dealers. The first clue of that came on my first night as a resident, when the intercom would BUZZZZ loudly all through the wee hours, by men who invariably gave, as their only name, “It’s Me, Lemme In.” Fortunately, the owners had just begun to clear the building of crooks; by my second month there, nearly a third of the apartment doors bore foreclosure notices.

By 1993, the building was being managed by Housing Resource Group Seattle, a nonprofit agency doing what it can to meet the ever-escalating need for “below market rate” (i.e., for non-millionaires) housing in our formerly-fair city.

Belltown was a happenin’ place at the time I moved in. While several artist spaces and studios had folded due to already-rising rents, there were still many (including Galleria Potatohead and the 66 Bell lofts). The Crocodile Cafe nightclub had just opened. The Vogue was in the middle of its 17-year reign as Seattle’s longest-running music club. The Frontier Room, the Two Bells, the Rendezvous, My Suzie’s, the original Cyclops, and the venerable Dog House were serving up affordable foods and/or drinks; to be soon joined by World Pizza.

By early 1995, the Speakeasy Cafe and the Crocodile had become the anchor-ends of a virtual hipster strip mall along Second Avenue, which also included Mama’s Mexican Kitchen, World Pizza, Shorty’s, the Lava Lounge, the Wall of Sound and Singles Going Steady record stores, the Vain hair salon, the Rendezvous, Black Dog Forge, and Tula’s jazz club.

But the place got a far pricier rep soon after that. In block after block, six-story condo complexes replaced the used-vacuum stores, recording studios, band-practice spaces, old-sailor hotels, and old-sailor bars. About the only spaces not turned into condos were turned into either (1) offices for the architects who designed the condos, and (2) fancy-shmancy $100-a-plate restaurants (the kind with valet parking, executive chefs, and menu items designated as “Market Price”).

The demolition of the SCUD building (home of the original Cyclops) in ’97, followed in ’99 by the condo-conversion of the 66 Bell art studios, provided more than enough confirmation that Belltown just wasn’t my kinda scene no more.

Moving on time was well due.

Maybe past due–aside from people in the same apartment building, by this spring I only knew five people who still lived in Belltown. Everyone else had either gone to other established boho ‘hoods in town or had joined Seattle’s new Hipster Diaspora, scattered to Ballard, Columbia City, Aurora, or White Center.

More about that in a few days.

TOMORROW: A few moving misadventures.

IN OTHER NEWS: The icon of many a blank-generation boy’s dreams is alive and well and living in Kelso!

ELSEWHERE:

REALITY! WHAT A CONCEPT!
Jun 30th, 2000 by Clark Humphrey

A FEW DAYS AGO, I briefly mentioned a vision I’d had of what social changes might potentially arise from a tech-company stock crash, should such a rapid downfall occur the way certain anti-dot-com and anti-Microsoft cynics around these parts hope it does.

(If you haven’t read it yet, please go ahead and do so. I’ll still be here when you get back.)

One aspect of this vision was that a general public backlash against “virtual realities” (computer-generated and otherwise) could lead to a craze for any personal or cultural experience that could be proclaimed as “reality.”

Let’s imagine such a possible fad a little further today.

I’m imagining a movement that could expand upon already-existing trends–

  • Martha Stewart’s home-arts fetishism;
  • the shared frustration with the gatekeeping and intermediating functions of what conservatives call “the Liberal Media” and liberals call “the Corporate Media;”
  • Old-hippie Luddites’ rants against anything to do with television;
  • Neo-hippie Luddites’ rants against anything to do with the entertainment conglomerates;
  • Granolaheads’ belief that anything “natural” is good for you (even cigarettes!);
  • The Burning Man Festival’s “all participants, no spectators” policy;
  • The retail industry’s move away from megamalls and toward “restored” downtowns;
  • The tourist industry’s increasing sending of underprepared civilians to such spots as Mt. Everest; and
  • The Xtreme-sports kids’ drive to live it-be it-do it.

It’s easy to see these individual trends coalescing into a macro-trend, coinciding with a quite-probable backlash against the digitally-intermediated culture of video games, porno websites, chat rooms, home offices, cubicle loneliness, et al.

As I wrote on Monday, live, in-person entertainment would, under this scenario, become the upscale class’s preference, instead of distanced, “intermediated” experiences. The self-styled “cultured” folks and intellectuals could come to disdain books, movies, radio, recorded music, and all other prepackaged arts even more than they currently disdain television.

(Not coincidentally, this disdain would emerge just after technology has allowed the masses to fully create and distribute their own books, movies, recorded music, etc.)

Society’s self-appointed tastemakers could come to insist on live theater instead of films, lecturers and storytellers instead of writers, participant sports (including “X-treme” sports) instead of spectator sports, and concerts (or playing one’s own instruments) instead of CDs.

The arts of rhetoric and public speaking could enjoy a revival on the campuses. The slam poetry and political speechifiying beloved by Those Kids of late just might expand into a full-blown revival of Chataqua-style oratory. On the conservative side of politics, Limbaugh wannabes might take their rhetorical acts away from radio and further into staged rallies and intimate breakfast-club meetings.

Jazz, the music that only truly exists when performed live, could also have another comeback.

Even “alternative” minded music types could get into this line of thinking; indeed, there are already burgeoning mini-fads in “house concerts” and neo-folk hootenaneys.

As packaged entertainment becomes more exclusively associated with nerds, squares, and people living outside major urban centers, it might come under new calls for regulation and even censorship; while live performance could become an anything-goes realm.

(If carried to its extreme, this could even lead to the recriminalization of print/video pornography, and/or the decriminalization of prostitution.)

The rich and/or the hip would demand real shopping in real stores (maybe even along the model of the traditional British shopkeepers, in which the wife rang up sales in the front room while the hubby made the merchandise in the back.)

Those without the dough might be expected (or even made) to use online instead of in-person shopping; much as certain banks “encourage” their less-affluent customers to use ATMs instead of live tellers.

In this scenario, what would become of writers–or, for that matter, cartoonists, filmmakers, record-store clerks, etc.?

(One group you won’t have to worry about: The entertainment conglomerates. They’ll simply put less capital into packaged-goods entertainment and more into theme parks (manmade but still “live” entertainment), Vegas-style revues, touring stage shows, music festivals, and the like.)

MONDAY: Another local landmark gets defaced a little more.

IN OTHER NEWS: There’s one fewer employer for washed-up baseball stars.

ELSEWHERE:

  • More anti-major-record-label screeds, this time from the ever-erudite Robert Fripp (found by Virulent Memes)….
  • Wasn’t too many years ago when “race-blind casting” meant all of a play’s stars were white, no matter what the ethnicity of the role. Things might be changing….
»  Substance:WordPress   »  Style:Ahren Ahimsa
© Copyright 1986-2025 Clark Humphrey (clark (at) miscmedia (dotcom)).