It's here! It's here! All the local news headlines you need to know about, delivered straight to your e-mail box and from there to your little grey brain.
Learn more about it here.
Sign up at the handy link below.
CLICK HERE to get on board with your very own MISCmedia MAIL subscription!
I hereby promise to post more of these in the near future.
(Remember, my big book shindig is one week from today (Sept. 24). See the top of this page for all pertinent details.)
sorry, maude, you didn't make the list
oh, NOW they get customers.
Radiohead.
For more than a decade, they’ve been a band on the cutting edge of music, or at least of music marketing.
So what do they do to give their new CD/LP/download product the splashy promotion they believe it deserves?
They come out with that most modern of media products.
A newspaper.
Specifically, a 12-page tabloid, handed out for free in select major cities, including this one. Online reports say copies went fast in many of these pass-out spots. (Last I heard, you could get one at Sonic Boom Records in Ballard, but only while supplies last.)
This sign of newsprint’s continued attention-grabbing viability comes two years and two weeks after the last print edition of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer.
Yes, I still mourn it.
I even dream about it. But I won’t get into that.
I will say I still believe there’s a P-I sized hole in the local media landscape. PubliCola, Seattle PostGlobe, Crosscut, and now SportsPress Northwest only fill pieces of that hole.
The SeattlePI.com website not only doesn’t fill its former parent journal’s role, it doesn’t even fill the role it could fill, as the go-to online local headline source.
It’s still designed like a newspaper’s web presence. The front page, and the second-tier directory pages, are each cluttered with 100 or more links, mostly to syndicated and wire pieces and to the contributions of unpaid bloggers. There’s no direct way to find the site’s own staff-written material (which remains remarkably good).
What’s worse, PI.com, as it’s currently structured, has little growth potential. It’s already generating as many “hits” as it did when it had a whole newspaper to give it content. It’s either just breaking even or is perpetually about to, according to which rumors you care to believe. There’s not much further revenue it can attract as a website with banner ads.
PI.com needs to find its next level.
With its current minimal staff, it likely couldn’t create a web app or a mobile app that could command a price from readers, a la Rupert Murdoch’s iPad “paper” The Daily or the newly paywalled NY Times site.
But it could repackage its current in-house content, plus the best of its bloggers’ contributions, into a free web app and/or mobile app.
This would make PI.com’s articles and essays better organized, easier to navigate and to read.
This would also offer advertisers with bigger, more productive ad spaces that would compliment, not clutter up, the reading experience.
Then of course, there’s always the possibility of moving the P-I back into print. Perhaps as a colorful freebie tabloid, one that could siphon off home and car ads from the SeaTimes and lifestyle ads from the slick regional monthlies.
Alternately, some of the local philanthropists who’d offered to take over the P-I from Hearst in 2009 could start their own paper, creating a new tradition.
I recently posted a link to marketing guru Garland Pollard’s list of  “brands to bring back.”
Now, the local angle on missing brands.
Pollard’s blog has praised Seattle’s Major League Soccer franchise for wisely keeping the beloved Sounders name.
He’s scolded the retailer formerly known as Federated Department Stores for trashing its beloved regional store names, including The Bon Marche. He’s suggested bringing those back at least in some capacity.
And when the Post-Intelligencer folded as a print daily, Pollard suggested things Hearst bigwigs could do to keep the P-I brand active, beyond a mere Web presence, such as a weekly print paper or magazine. I think that’s still a good idea.
I, of course, have my own faves I’d like brought back:
As I promised a week or so ago, here’s some of what I would do to improve SeattlePI.com.
But first, the answer to “why bother?”
This town needs a primary news source that isn’t the increasingly Foxified Seattle Times.
The local TV newscasts and their affiliated Web sites, themselves shrinking and mayhem-centric, are no substitute. Neither is the feature-oriented KUOW. Neither are the small and scrappy Publicola and Crosscut. Barring some new entrepreneurial venture, that leaves PI.com.
As I wrote, that site’s coverage has steadily improved since its inauspicious start as a standalone entity one year go. But it still has a ways to go.
First, the easy improvements:
Now for the hard part:
When I return to this topic in a few days, I’ll talk about how a lean startup venture could help fill some of these holes in the local info-scape.
Just got back from the SeattlePI.com one-year anniversary party. The Crocodile was all done up with pastel pink and blue “baby color” balloons. (The Seattle Weekly anniversary parties I’ve been to were all festooned with black, white, and red balloons, as in “black and white and re(a)d all over.”)
The first song by the first band on stage included the repeated refrain, “I want to dance on your grave.”
With the prominent exception of David Horsey, most of the 120 or so people there were well under 40, nay under 30. They were significantly younger, on the average, than the people I’d seen at any of the P-I memorial gatherings over the previous year (of which there were at least three). They weren’t about mourning the dying old media. They were about celebrating the shiny new media (or at least celebrating this particular new-media venture’s survival in-this-economic-climate etc.).
I don’t need to rant about PI.com’s shortcomings. Its own people know about them. They’re scrambling to put out a popular site on a skeletal budget. I remember the early months of The Stranger, and that venture also was then heavy on proven circulation-building features, light on hard news.
What I can do, and will do, is suggest how PI.com or someone else can help fill the big holes that still exist in local news coverage.
Our pals at Seattle PostGlobe, one of the nonprofit online ventures started by Post-Intelligencer vets, have their own view of the still gaping hole left in this city by the print P-I’s demise.
Today, or yesterday, or the day before (however you wish to count it) is the one-year anniversary of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer’s disappearance from area newsstands and vending boxes and doorsteps. The final edition was edited on 3/16/09 and distributed on 3/17/09.
That made 3/18/09 the first day since the print P-I stopped. That’s why tonight, 3/18/10, is the one-year anniversary of seattlepi.com as a stand-alone Web site. The site’s “producers” (they were careful to avoid Newspaper Guild-recognized job titles) are holding what they bill as an evening of celebration at the Crocodile.
It’ll still seem like a wake to me.
PI.com officials say the site now gets as many “hits” and readers as it did when it had a newspaper feeding it content. They’ve scraped and scrambled to get to that level, using every trick in the old Hearst playbook–canned gossip items, comics, cute animal pictures, fashion pictures, basically all the soft sides of Wm. Randolph Hearst Sr.’s old circulation-building formula. (The hard side of that formula, the scandals and exposés, would require more person-hours of research than the site’s minimal staff can muster.)
Most days, there’s at least one significant local news story on the site. Its sports commentary and tech-biz coverage have steadily improved. Local entertainment coverage disappeared from the site altogether when it went web-only; now at least there’s some.
The site’s design is still too cluttered, but it’s better than it was.
But it’s not the depth-and-breadth news source that the print P-I had been at its best, and that today’s Seattle Times sometimes tries, but usually fails, to be.
To become that, PI.com would need to bulk up from its current 20-person core staff to at least double that.
Even if online advertising rebounds from the current all-around business slump, it’s unlikely to generate enough revenue to support that. (PI.com, from all accounts, is inching toward profitability as is.)
It’ll need some other, or additional, revenue model. Â (An iPad paper? A print weekly?)
Until then, or until some other new venture or set of ventures shows up, Seattle’s information landscape will still have a P-I sized hole needing to be filled.
Just saw It’s Not In the P-I, the “living newspaper” stage revue at North Seattle Community College (one of my alma maters), co-written by some former Post-Intelligencer newsies.
Well acted and well paced, it’s a quick succession of sketches and running gags featuring wacky F-bombing reporters, clueless bosses, and all your funny newsroom anecdote-type material.
It contained no new insights as to why big newspapers are failing, and no overt ideas about what to replace them with.
But since every well-made satire reveals its alternative ideal world within the aesthetic of its work, one can surmise what the playwrights would like: Something personal, human-scale, telling people’s stories with emotion and frankly admitted bias, unencumbered by corporate restraint.
In short, something more like Seattle’s fringe theater tradition.
An Atlantic writer has visited Seattle and talked to several former Post-Intelligencer staffers, including one who went from writing about dive bars to co-owning one (the fabulous Streamline on lower Queen Anne).
I’ve finally let my Seattle Times subscription lapse, after seven months with SeaTimes and 31 prior years with the now-discontinued print P-I. The only thing I’d still used the print paper for, that couldn’t be done online, was to methodically study how much smaller the SeaTimes was getting.
As a print subscriber, I was hardly supporting the newsroom. Subscription fees barely pay for the manufacture and delivery of the physical product. What I was doing was adding to the aggregate eyeballs the SeaTimes could sell to advertisers. That company’s done a lousy job at selling ads the past several years. Even before the Internet killed want ads and the Great Recession decimated home and car sales, they’d already been losing huge accounts to direct mail.
Supporting “newspaper style journalism,” and transitioning from it to something better, is a topic I’ve long written about.
Online ads earn far less income per reader than print ads. This is unlikely to change any time soon. SeattlePI.com has the potential to become profitable once the general economy improves, but won’t likely ever support anything near the news staff the print P-I had.
I currently see three potential scenarios:
1) Print papers continue to shrink, not to oblivion but to the point that they become vulnerable to startup competitors (who suddenly don’t have to pour in $30 million a year in costs and who can target niche audiences in a way old-line dailies can’t).
2) Print papers continue to shrink, to the point where they’re small enough to become subsidized by their big-business community friends (either through contributions or vanity ads).
3) New ebook-esque consumer devices (the long-rumored Apple tablet?) finally make true online publications with paid subscriptions not only feasible but popular.
Another viewpoint: Doug Morrison sees the Incredible Shrinking Newspaper as an issue affecting the exchange of ideas, the flow of facts, and even the future of democracy itself, and wonders if there could be a political solution.
…new news site is now up, christened Seattle PostGlobe. It’s as unassuming at its start as the rump relic of the official P-I site. Let’s hope both grow and blossom.