It's here! It's here! All the local news headlines you need to know about, delivered straight to your e-mail box and from there to your little grey brain.
Learn more about it here.
Sign up at the handy link below.
CLICK HERE to get on board with your very own MISCmedia MAIL subscription!
Remember the big plan to revive All My Children and One Life to Live as online-only soap operas? Ain’t gonna happen. The economics just weren’t there.
On Saturday, Occupy Seattle folks disrupted a pro-Occupy Wall Street panel discussion at Town Hall, using the “people’s mic” tactic to prevent just about anything from happening.
On Tuesday, Occupiers blocked the intersection of Fifth and Pine. The expected police response was nasty.
Question: Is this about making a spectacle, about disruption for disruption’s sake? Or is it about something beyond our own selves?
Additional question: Is the job of a police department to maintain order at the cost of violently intensifying the disorder?
washingtonstatewire.com
So the voters of the state finally up and did it.
They took liquor retailing away from themselves (the people of the state) and gave it to the likes of Costco and Safeway.
I for one will miss the state liquor stores, which will be closed or auctioned off to private operators some time next year.
In a modern marketing world where everything was loud and flashy and out to sell-sell-sell, this was one major retail chain out not to promote its wares, but to control their sale.
The stores were mostly no-frills operations, with modest signage and minimalist interior decor.
The employed unionized clerks, whose job was to facilitate sales, not to increase them.
In most years, they generated at least enough revenue to pay for the state’s alcohol treatment and anti-drunk-driving programs.
But their main function was service, not sales.
(Booze For People, Not For Profit.)
They showed by example that consumer goods can be distributed without excess hype, and without the secular religion of excess consumption.
'off the mark' by mark parisi
It’s no longer good enough for us to tell kids who are different that it’s going to get better. We have to make it better now, that’s every single one of us. Every teacher, every student, every adult has to step up to the plate.
jiyoung-s.blogspot.com/
Broadway and Pine. The south lawn of Seattle Central Community College. 1:30 p.m. Saturday.
Throughout the area, cute cartoon monsters are displayed on painted plywood stand-up pieces. It’s an installation called “Monsters on Broadway.”
Also throughout the area, young-adult volunteers are pulling batches of hay from bales and spreading it over every part of the lawn. The smell reminds me of the hobby farm on which I grew up. This, it turns out, is not part of “Monsters on Broadway.”
Instead, as a kind lady on the hay-spreading team tells me, they’re covering the grass to protect it from turning into mud. Occupy Seattle would set up its tents on the lawn later in the day. The whole area was going to be heavily walked and stood and even slept on, perhaps for some time.
Fast forward to 6 p.m. Halloween Saturday night is slowly getting underway. The Hill’s regular weekend-night parade of colorful characters is at least a little more colorful. Men and women walk around as zombies, vampires, celebrities living and dead (and undead), and cartoon characters. In and near the more upscale bars, some of the women are dressed just slightly “sexier” than normal for a Saturday.
Back at SCCC, Occupy Seattle events have begun. There’s a speaker’s platform, with a microphone and a small set of amplifiers. There’s a covered feeding station. A few dozen people are there, some in costume. These include a disco dude in a metallic toga (with a wool scarf covering his lower face, WTO style), a Maid Marian with a sign reading “Where Is My Robin Hood?,” several generic fantasy and steampunk getups, and at least one guy in a Guy Fawkes mask, a la the graphic novel and film “V for Vendetta.” (The graphic novel’s author Alan Moore denouced the film, and earns nothing from the masks.)
It’s at least an hour before the main scheduled events get underway. The speaker’s platform bears a succession of orators discussing topics outside the “Occupy” movement’s already broad subject matter. I leave as a woman at the mic promotes 9/11 conspiracy theories, with the audience repeating her statments call-and-response style. (This shtick comes from the original Occupy Wall Street protests, which aren’t allowed to use amplifiers.)
From there I go to a Pike/Pine bar. A woman there tells me she’s “so over” the “Occupy” protests. She claims they’ve degenerated into protesting for protesting’s sake. This remark upsets the man seated next to her, who’s stopping for a drink on his way to join the camping-out protesters. He says something to the effect that he hopes the woman’s happy being part of the problem instead of the solution. (Hint: If you’re going to build a popular, all-welcoming movement, it’s unwise to go around insulting people.)
Back at SCCC, tent raising time officially begins around 8:30. A few campers had already put up their shelters ahead of time. Several hundred people have gathered for the main “street party” (not actually in the street) with pumpkin carving and more costume characters.
Hours later, well into the bar scene’s peak hours, about 150 people would settle in for the night. More than three dozen tents were raised.
•
They’d had to move somewhere. Even the most capital-P progressive mayor wasn’t likely to let the protests remain 24/7 indefinitely at Westlake. Especially not with the annual Christmas carousel less than a month away from installation.
SCCC is about as Occupier-friendly a public space as can be had in the heart of Seattle. The teachers’ union is an outspoken “Occupy” supporter. The college president released a statement giving at least tacit, tentative permission for the camp.
This space is not really the place for a thorough analysis of the “Occupy” movement and its agenda. Suffice it to say they’re responding to long-term trends in U.S. society, and doing so with long-term tactics. By announcing no end date to their protests, and no single, simple demand to be met, they’re stating that building their society will also be a long-term endeavor.
(Cross posted with the Capitol Hill Times.)
SeaTimes average paid circulation has shrunk again, to 242,814.
This is according to the latest Audit Bureau of Circulation report, covering the six months ending Sept. 30. This decline is comparable to that of other big-city dailies.
(One exception to this trend: The NY Times, which actually has more Sunday print readers nowadays. That’s because it’s offering “weekender” print subscribers full access to the NYT’s online content, at less than half the price of a web-only subscription.)
The SeaTimes still plans to vacate its 81-year-old landmark HQ on Fairview Ave. The company now plans to hold on to the site, while offering a “ground lease” deal to developers. If one reads between the lines of the paper’s spokesperson Jill Mackie in the linked story, one can conclude the company hopes to help subsidize the paper’s losses via real-estate profits.
Before those profits, if any, kick in, there are areas where the already-thin paper could keep shrinking.
The biggest of these is the space given to wire-service stories, particularly on Sunday.
Some local-reporting beats could be turned into blog-like columns, to which assigned reporters would fill a predictable quota of  column-inches every week, whether there’s a big story in that subject area or not.
The SeaTimes could also give up on home delivery for the nearly ad-free Mon.-Wed. papers. (The potential snag to this idea: its recent deal to take over the Everett Herald’s delivery operations.)
sotnight.blogspot.com
I know some of these are a few days old. My present life is just that hectic, yes.
king-tv
Before Thomas Frank became a renowned author of geekily-researched anti-conservative sermon books, he co-ran a tart, biting, yet beautifully designed journal of essays called The Baffler.
It was based in Chicago for most of its existence. Its original focus was the intersecting worlds of corporate culture (including corporate “counterculture”), entertainment, and marketing. (It’s where Steve Albini’s 1994 screed against the music industry’s treatment of bands, “Some Of Your Friends Are Already This Fucked,” first appeared.) As Frank’s concerns steered toward the political, so did The Baffler‘s.
Its one consistent aspect was its irregular schedule. Though it was sometimes advertised as a “quarterly,” only 18 issues appeared from 1988 to 2009.
This will now change.
The title was bought in May by essayist/historian John Summers. Last week, Summers announced he’s attained backing from the MIT Press. MIT and Summers promise to put out three Bafflers a year for the next five years.
This is good news, because we need its uncompromising voice more than ever.
(Told you I wouldn’t necessarily be providing these headlines every day.)
gadgetsin.com
As power in the book biz moves increasingly from Manhattan to here, the Manhattan news media treat it as a crisis, or at least as a matter of controversy.
Hence, the Sunday NY Times op-ed package posing the musical question, “Will Amazon Kill Off Book Publishers?”
What rot.
Worse, it’s predictable rot.
I’ve ranted on and on here, since years before the e-book became a marketable commodity, about the traditional book industry’s stodginess, parochialism, and criminal inefficiency.
I’ve also ranted about the particular cultural conservatism (bordering on the reactionary) that’s long held sway within the big-L Literary subculture. (That scene is not the same thing as the book industry, even though it thinks it ought to be).
Current example: Dennis Johnson (a respected publisher of, and advocate for, big-L Literary product), claiming in the NYT debate-in-print that
…publishing isn’t, right now, and hasn’t been, for 500 years, about developing [sales] algorithms. It’s been about art-making and culture-making and speaking truth to power.
The corner of publishing Johnson occupies might be about art n’ culture making.
But the whole of publishing is, and always has been, about the bottom line.
And in societies such as this one where there’s no royal family or state church to prop up (and censor) publishing, that bottom line means sales.
And, I will argue, that’s mostly been a good thing.
Not in spite of the ephemeral commercial dross that’s been the bulk of most commercial publishers’ product, but because of it.
The romances. The mysteries. The space operas. The treacle-y 19th century “ladies’ stories.” The pulp adventures. The lurid ’60s paperbacks. The advice and how-to guides. The travelogues. The comics. The fads. The tracts (spiritual, political, dietary). The bodice-rippers. The porn. The celebrity memoirs. And, yeah, today’s teen vampires and werewolves. They’re all where the passions of their particular times and places are preserved.
But Johnson wants to know how big-L Literary work will fare in the brave new e-world.
I say it will thrive as never before.
For the e-book business model is not, as Johnson fears, a recipe for monopoly.
It’s about less consolidation, not more.
There are three major e-book sales sites, and hundreds of minor ones.
Anybody can sell just about anything in e-book form on their own, or via one of these sites.
And they are.
Cottage industries are springing up to provide editing and design services for e-book self publishers.
And new small presses are forming to more fully curate “quality” ebooks, and to more effectively promote them.
Big-L Literature was, at best, a prestige sideline for the old-line major publishers. Smaller specialty presses, like Johnson’s, had to play by the big presses’ business rules (including devastating return policies with bookstores); rules that made Johnson’s kind of books hellishly difficult to put out at even a break-even level.
That good, and sometimes great, books of highbrow or artistic fiction came out of that business model, and came out regularly, is a testament to the perseverance of impresarios such as Johnson, and to authors’ willingness to work for the equivalent of less than minimum wage.
The e-book business model doesn’t guarantee success.
But it gives specialty works, and their makers, a fighting chance.
seattle sounders fc, via seattleweekly.com
classickidstv.co.uk