It's here! It's here! All the local news headlines you need to know about, delivered straight to your e-mail box and from there to your little grey brain.
Learn more about it here.
Sign up at the handy link below.
CLICK HERE to get on board with your very own MISCmedia MAIL subscription!
widescreenmuseum.com
The next big thing in cultural preservation: indie and art-house cinemas, and their need to buy (and maintain) costly new digital projectors.
As with many adapt-or-die technology transitions, it’s partly propelled by money. In this case, it’s the money of the big Hollywood studios.
They now spend more than a billion dollars each year making and shipping film prints. They’d rather spend that on supporting artistically ambitious but less commercial filmmakers cocaine and whores.
The studios want all theaters to convert to digital, as quickly as possible. They’re offering financial incentives to theaters who accept movies on hard drives instead of 35mm reels.
(As I briefly explained a few years back, the digital formats for theaters are called “2K” and “4K.” The latter offers about four times as many pixels as Blu-ray discs, or about 10 times the detail of DVDs. Theaters receive “digital prints” on hard drives, inserted into specially made projectors. The exhibition side of digital cinema is called “DCP” (for “Digital Cinema Package”.))
Already, the studios are refusing to rent out 35mm prints of many classics. Within three years, they might not send out any films on, you know, film.
Even with the studio incentives (which come with significant restrictions and which smaller distributors can have trouble matching), the transition’s tough enough for the big chain cinemas (where attendance is the lowest it’s been since the mid 1990s).
For the smaller operators and the nonprofit exhibitors, the cost could be fatal. But if they stick with only analog equipment, they might have nothing available to show on it.
•
And if film factories and labs lose the business of theatrical prints, it might not be financially feasible to make and process 35mm film for movie cameras.
Which brings us to the other end of the process.
Many directors (not just the George Lucases and James Camerons) now prefer to shoot their movies digitally.
It’s more versatile than film. It reduces the time needed to set up a shot. It makes 3D and other special effects a lot easier. It allows more and longer shots (including the single continuous take that is Russian Ark). The equipment’s smaller, less delicate, and easier to learn. Outtakes don’t waste costly film. Directors can shoot more “alternate takes,” then decide during editing which ones best fit a film’s overall pacing.
Digital shooting has also been a godsend for documentaries and indies. The whole Seattle independent filmmaking scene of the past decade has relied almost entirely on digital shooting.
But the technology that’s a boon to people who make indie movies is a burden to people who show them.
Nationally, about two thirds of all theaters have DCP gear. The two SIFF Cinemas are already digitally equipped, as are the chain-owned theaters SIFF uses during the festival. (Though the process has had its hiccups.)
As for the rest, they could settle for showing digital movies (from non-major distributors) on lower-res Blu-ray or even-lower-res DVD discs. (This is what the Northwest Film Forum’s apparently doing, at least for now.) For smaller rooms with smaller screens, Blu-ray output might be good enough. It displays almost as many pixels as the 2K digital-cinema standard (but doesn’t have the extra-tuff copy protection and other Big Brother features the big studios demand). And because Blu-ray uses mass-market gear, it’s a lot cheaper for both exhibitors and distributors.
Or they could combine hi-res projectors with hi-bandwidth Internet connections or satellite dishes, to get programming direct from the distributor. (That’s what those cinema airings of live Metropolitan Opera shows use.)
Or they could spring for DCP, even with its cost and its studio-decreed operational restrictions. Some nonprofit art houses might need special fund drives for the gear, which starts at around $60,000 without 3D capability.
Or they could just close up shop.
One industry analyst guesses maybe 5 percent of the country’s current 5,700 cinemas could close due to the digital transition. Many of those could be small-town theaters and drive-ins, whose big-studio fare will become available only via DCP.
Then there’s the little matter of storage and presentation.
Digital editing and retouching have done wonders for film restoration.
But nobody knows yet how long the physical media on which the digits are stored will last.
Or whether the machines to play them will still exist in future centuries.
For foolproof long-term keeping of movies, there’s still nothing like real film.
P.S.: I’ve linked to this before, but this post is the perfect excuse to re-link to it. It’s my favorite work of “technical writing,” a pinnacle of depth and clarity. It’s a 1930 RCA instruction manual for movie theater operators, teaching them how to properly present those newfangled talking pictures.
P.P.S.: Even with digital’s cost advantage, many filmmakers defiantly still film and edit on actual film. And now, for the first time in 50 years, a film is being made in original three-strip Cinerama!
Jim Bracher at the Seattle Backpackers Magazine site offers a mostly-positive review of our somewhat-new book Walking Seattle:
The author’s knowledge of Seattle is extensive, comprehensive, and impressive. I didn’t realize part of Perkins Lane is still closed after the mudslides in ’97 (p. 64), and I’d forgotten the horror that dominated the news after the murders at the Wah Mee club in ’83 (p. 79). He also reminded me of The Blob (p. 58), a building I’d forgotten even though I used to walk by it almost daily.… This guy knows architecture. I know bungalows from Queen Anne, but he knows Art Moderne from Beaux Arts.… Architecture helps tell the story of a city. The current downtown Seattle Library is a statement about what we want the city to be, what we want others to see when they look at us, and what sort of buildings we want to see when go out. All the buildings of Seattle’s past were designed for the same purpose. The bungalows, the big homes of Queen Anne Hill’s past, all tell the story of what was going on in Seattle. It’s a cool history. I wish Humphrey had told more of it.… He’s a good writer. The prose flows. Reading through the tour descriptions is easy and clear…. I’d love more story-telling. He’s capable of it and the book shows he knows it.
The author’s knowledge of Seattle is extensive, comprehensive, and impressive. I didn’t realize part of Perkins Lane is still closed after the mudslides in ’97 (p. 64), and I’d forgotten the horror that dominated the news after the murders at the Wah Mee club in ’83 (p. 79). He also reminded me of The Blob (p. 58), a building I’d forgotten even though I used to walk by it almost daily.…
This guy knows architecture. I know bungalows from Queen Anne, but he knows Art Moderne from Beaux Arts.… Architecture helps tell the story of a city. The current downtown Seattle Library is a statement about what we want the city to be, what we want others to see when they look at us, and what sort of buildings we want to see when go out. All the buildings of Seattle’s past were designed for the same purpose. The bungalows, the big homes of Queen Anne Hill’s past, all tell the story of what was going on in Seattle. It’s a cool history. I wish Humphrey had told more of it.…
He’s a good writer. The prose flows. Reading through the tour descriptions is easy and clear…. I’d love more story-telling. He’s capable of it and the book shows he knows it.
Bracher also has some dislikes about the book. Almost all of those relate to the publisher’s series format (page size, layout, etc.).
And he wishes there was a smartphone app for it.
Guess what? There is! It’s an add-on virtual tour guide that works within the iOS/Android app ViewRanger.
But on the whole, he likes Walking Seattle.
And you will too.
Some recent developments in the Apple/Amazon/big book publishers/Justice Dept. rumble:
david eskenazi collection via sportspressnw.com
And a happy Friday the 13th (first of the year) and Mariners home opening day to all of you!
It’s called “Control-based Content Pricing,†and the basic idea is dynamic pricing of video content, based on the preferences of the user at any given moment—essentially setting different prices for different functions of the TV remote.
gjenvick-gjonvik archives
Three of the Big Six book publishers (Hachette, News Corp.’s HarperCollins, and CBS’s Simon & Schuster) have settled with the U.S. Justice Dept. in the dispute over alleged e-book price fixing.
The publishers still insist they’re innocent; but they agreed in the settlement to not interfere with, or retaliate against, discounted e-book retail prices.
Apple, Pearson’s Penguin, and Holtzbrinck’s Macmillan have not yet settled; they also insist they did not collude to keep e-book prices up. Bertlesmann’s Random House was not sued.
This is, of course, all really about Amazon, and its ongoing drives to keep e-book retail prices down and its share of those revenues up. The big publishers, and some smaller ones too, claim that’s bad for them and for the book biz as a whole.
In other randomosity:
vintage seattle bus on 'ride free day,' available at allposters.com
Bad idea: King County Metro still plans to axe the downtown Seattle Ride Free Area in September.
Worse idea: The county and the city plan to replace this valuable service, not with a full equivalent service but just with an infrequent “short bus” circulator route, intended strictly to help poor residents get to social-service offices and medical appointments.
Not nearly enough.
Not even nearly nearly enough.
Free downtown bus service has been used here since the 1970s by all economic castes.
Before that, Metro and predecessor Seattle Transit ran a “dime shuttle” looping around downtown.
This kind of service can and should return.
First, the current #99 route, looping Alaskan Way and First Avenue, should become a more frequent, all-day, free (or lower-fare) service.
Second, another free (or lower-fare) route should go up and down Third Avenue, from Seattle Center to Pioneer Square and doglegging to the International District.
(Alternately, this could be two routes; one looping north on Fourth and south on Third, the other looping north on Third and south on Second. That would so help people avoid downtown’s steep slopes.)
If the county and the city can’t fund this service themselves, bring in the Downtown Seattle Association and the Downtown Metropolitan Improvement District to pitch in.
Because this is a service to the shoppers, diners, workers, and residents of greater downtown (and also to human-service-agency clients).
It reduces auto traffic, and helps people avoid costly parking.
It makes downtown a better place to be in and to live in.
If it can’t be in place when the Ride Free area ends in September, it could at least get instigated by the Xmas shopping season.
Let’s get this vehicle on the road.
reramble.wordpress.com
oldtime (print) proofreading marks; via nisus.se
It’s a couple months old but still a worthy topic of debate. It’s ex-Microsoftie Michael Kinsley bitching about how the Web has brought forth an explosion in written content—much of which is tons of total dreck.
Even a lot of professionally written online stuff, Kinsley gripes, is poorly thought out, poorly constructed, and sloppily assembled.
I say that’s just what happens with an explosion of activity in any “creative” field, from neo-punk bands to televised singing contests to self-published horror novels.
The trick is to (1) have a way to find the good stuff, and (2) encourage folks to strive for better work.
As for the first part, there are tons of aggregation sites and blogs (including this one)Â that link to what some editor thinks is “the good stuff.”
The second part still needs work.
One problem is that so much of the Web is run by techies. Dudes who know the value of tight, accurate, effective code, but who might never have learned to appreciate the same values in words.
A bigger problem is that, even at sites run by “content” people, there’s intense pressure to put everything online the second it’s written, and to slavishly avoid taking the time or staff money to edit anything.
It would help if more sites felt an incentive to put out better stuff. (A big incentive would be to maybe, just maybe, even pay writers and editors a living wage).
Don’t think of the ol’ WWW as code and wires.
The Web is words (and pictures and sounds), distributed via code and wires.
Most folks who tell you to “think outside the box” really want you to think inside another box. A box they’ve made.
wallace in a philip morris cigarette ad, circa 1957
The master of the “gotcha!’ interview had been a journeyman broadcaster since the days of old time radio. He’d been an announcer, a game show host (he hosted the unaired original pilot for To Tell the Truth), an actor in live TV dramas (and the film A Face in the Crowd), and a commercial pitchman for cigarettes and other assorted products.
Then in 1955, he started a New York local interview show called Nightbeat, renamed The Mike Wallace Interview when it moved to ABC. It established Wallace’s persona as a sensationalistic opportunist, more a tabloidy hothead than a newsman.
This rough edge was sanded down a bit when he became one of the original co-hosts (with Harry Reasoner) of 60 Minutes, putting a real news organization’s resources (including its lawyers) behind his shtick.
The rest is broadcast history.
Including his admission to long bouts of severe depression. The last on-air bit he did was a “CBS Cares” public-service spot about the illness.
Yet through it all he survived.
Now there are even fewer people left from TV’s early years, and fewer still (most notably Betty White) still working.
Seventy degrees on Easter. It felt like the whole outdoors had come back to life.
casey mcnerthney, seattlepi.com
…In the long term today’s affordable housing comes from yesterday’s luxury flats, and cutting off the supply of the latter will deny our children the former in the absence of massive, unsustainable public subsidy.
An Eastside developer has bought the whole half block that contains Bauhaus Coffee, Spine and Crown Books, Wall of Sound Records, and five other merchants who help define the soul of the Pike/Pine Corridor.
All except the facades will be demolished, for yet another mixed-use behemoth.
The businesses themselves will be gone, either this June or next June (sources are contradictory about this).
And they probably can’t afford the new spaces when they finally open, at least a year and a half later.
Not voting = voting a straight right-wing ticket. Period.
If you think you’re “too political” to sully your ideological purity, you’re doing just what the Koch Bros., Karl Rove, and Rush Limbaugh would like you to do.
Yes, I know several close friends will adamantly disagree with this.
These friends will agree to support ballot initiatives and referenda.
They’ll make themselves highly visible at protest events.
But they won’t be seen supporting a living breathing politician, except the occasional minor-party candidate like Nader.
Otherwise, they’re content to just protest all the bad things that get done, without doing anything practical to get good things done.
So righteous. So superior. So black-n’-white.
I, however, believe in shades of gray.
The non-theoretical world is a land of deals, hustles, and heartbreaks.
Obama always claimed to be a centrist. You should not feel betrayed when he turned out to really be one.
Yes, he’s compromised, with the defense lobby, the food lobby, the national security lobby, etc.
But the answer to only getting half of the agenda you want is not to throw it all away, to let the whole system be taken over by the guys who want total “freedom” for corporations and the rich, and brutal oppression toward the rest of us.
The only way to make anything happen in that world is to be in it, not to pronounce yourself too perfect to risk being sullied.
And don’t just run a Presidential candidate. Thanks to the Electoral College, there’s no practical way to get elected President without a nationwide, year-round party infrastructure behind you.
You want an American left that’s a real thing? Push for policies AND people, top to bottom, every district, every state.
Run through the Democratic Party structure when you can; through indie campaigns when you must. Markos Moulitsas of the Daily Kos calls this a push for “not just more Democrats but better Democrats.”
Building a national, permanent movement involves a lot of long, hard, boring work. It’s the opposite of the WTO anarchists’ slogan “Live Without Dead Time.”
But it’s the only way to make national, permanent changes.
Protesting, no matter how vigorous and high-profile, is never enough.
(P.S.: There’s been a highly active comment thread about this topic on Facebook lately.)