It's here! It's here! All the local news headlines you need to know about, delivered straight to your e-mail box and from there to your little grey brain.
Learn more about it here.
Sign up at the handy link below.
CLICK HERE to get on board with your very own MISCmedia MAIL subscription!
artist's rendering; via kiro-tv
t.j. mullinax, yakima herald-republic
The Seattle Times‘ series about Amazon.com’s corporate culture continued on Monday with a long recounting of the company’s often prickly relations with book publishers large and small; especially small.
I’ve written in the past that the six U.S. mega-publishers could sure use a “creative disruption” (to use a hoary techno-Libertarian cliché), to sweep away their hidebound old ways and become more nimble, more competitive, and more profitable.
These same new rules, once everybody’s figured out what they are, could also help out smaller imprints.
But in the meantime (which could seem like an eternity in dot-com years but the blink of an eye in book-biz years), Amazon should not push too far against the “long tail” publishers and distributors who make its “World’s Largest Selection” slogan possible.
It’s bad for the publishers and their authors.
It’s bad for the industry as a whole.
And it’s bad for Amazon.
The e-tail giant had better realize, and soon, that it doesn’t have the market muscle to push its suppliers around like Walmart does.
Except to owners of Kindle machines (which are hardwired to only download commercial ebooks if they’re from Amazon), everything its core media business sells can be bought from other sources, just a mouse click or a search-engine hunt away.
Also, many of these smaller publishers have loyal niche clienteles.
All they have to do is offer lower prices or “customer loyalty” incentives to folks buying books on the publishers’ own sites.
Or, the small pubishers could offer all sorts of “customer loyalty” incentives to their direct buyers.
It’s to Amazon’s own fiscal interest to not appear like a bully here.
via shelligator.tumblr.com
You will note we posted nothing on 4/1. We’ve had enough trouble over the years with people thinking the stuff posted here’s just made up.
In recent months I have resumed my primary occupation of looking for paid employment.*
During this, I have become all too aware of the dorky buzzwords found in present day employment ads.
One of the most egregious examples is the header “ROCK STARS WANTED.”
It’s seen fronting searches for everything from programmers to marketing trainees to attorneys to chain-restaurant drudges—and occasionally (very occasionally) even for musicians.
So let me get this straight: Major corporations are just dyin’ to fill their ranks with guys possessed by fatally large egos, who swagger about like they’re God’s gift to the universe, who expect every female to want to fuck them, and who stand a great chance of becoming drug casualties.
That’s not a personality profile for a corporate employee.
That’s a personality profile for a corporate executive.
Thanx and a hat tip to Urso Chappell for suggesting this topic.
*Yes, my many, many varied skills (not just “writing”) are available to help your business or nonprofit shine. Email now. Operators are standing by.
sherriequilt.blogspot.com
via boingboing.net
a&p store in wallingford, circa 1938; via pauldorpat.com
My former employers at the Stranger have come out with a new ad-heavy arts quarterly. Its title: Seattle A&P (for “Art and Performance”).
It gives me an excuse to discuss one of my personal obsessions, with the company known as A&P (its official name: The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company).
It was once the largest grocery chain in America. At its peak it essentially owned the food biz east of the Rockies, and also had outposts in Seattle and L.A.
It was even considered a dire threat to the existence of small business.
But after decades of mismanagement, the brand today only exists in the New York suburbs. (The company also owns five other Northeast regional chains acquired over the years.)
The last Seattle A&P stores were sold or closed in 1974. The largest single batch of these selloffs (five stores) went to QFC, forming a major jump in that chain’s drive toward local dominance.
ap photo via newstimes.com
Today’s lesson in why traditional websites can’t support professional local news begins at a blog called Seattle Media Maven.
It’s run as a moonlighting project by Maureen Jeude, who’s got a day job in the Seattle Times’ “strategic marketing research” department. While the blog is her own endeavor, Jeude often uses it to tout the Times and its online ventures.
Thusly, Jeude ran a piece last month plugging the Times‘ website as one of the top local media sites in the nation. She posts stats and a graph showing the site garnering about 1 million page views per day (twice that of the local runner-up, KING5.com), and 1 million unique visitors per month.
This means each Times online reader reads an average of just one article a day.
Further, if each of the 240,000 Times print buyers (not counting “pass along” readership) read only the average four stories on each edition’s front page, that alone would essentially match the Times’ online readership.
And that online readership is the 16th biggest of any U.S. newspaper.
•
Elsewhere in medialand, three research studies in the past year (by A.C. Nielsen, the FCC, and Pew Research) each purport that news sites comprise only a small percentage of total Web traffic, and that local news sites comprise only a small percentage of that.
One industry analyst, Tom Grubisich, says the studies fatally discount the role of links and summaries of news sites’ stories on other sites such as Facebook.
Another analyst, Joshua Benton, insists that news sites’ readerships make up in community influence what they lack in sheer numbers.
The Seattle Times editorial board advocates for the rich and powerful in Washington state every day. They have used their editorial page to attack any proposal that would lay a finger on the 1% or their expansive stock portfolios. At the same time, they do their best to ensure kids, seniors, and low-income families absorb billions in budget cuts year after year.
The American parade of pathetic little bigots, who falsely imagine themselves to be valiant crusaders instead of the bullheaded jerks they really are, just goes on and on.
Recent examples:
'water wood' by bette burgoyne; via roqlarue.com